The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 766 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
SDS mentioned potential investment of about £260 billion in various sectors, including construction, oil and gas, shipbuilding, advanced manufacturing, over the next 10 years. You spoke of a five-to-10-year vision in your report, which I imagine is about its implementation. If we accept that the system needed to be changed—which we did, because you were asked to carry out a review—what concerns do you have that the opportunities to take full advantage of the investment that is needed might be missed in that timeframe?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
In your response to Murdo Fraser, you talked about the need for change. That was not just a question of asking for more money, but you recognised that, certainly on the apprenticeship side, 3 per cent of the total spend is probably not enough. Government has been quite clear that it will not change its approach to tuition fees and university funding. Money is extremely limited. Do you see a contradiction in what can be delivered for apprenticeships? Having spoken to some in the college sector, I know that there is a real fear that, as has happened in the past, it will be the one to get its budget squeezed again. We all recognise that there are not enough apprenticeship places and that there is huge demand.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Those who are unable to get a place for a modern apprenticeship may go to college and then on to university, and they will be unavailable as part of the workforce for longer. We are still investing in them, quite rightly, but we are perhaps spending more money than we might have done if we had provided them with apprenticeship places in the first place.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I will resist the temptation to move on to other aspects of graduate apprenticeships and funding. However, on my visit to Serimax during apprenticeship week, I heard the same thing as Murdo Fraser—that there are a lot more applicants for graduate apprenticeships than there are places. Which route do those who are unsuccessful and do not secure an apprenticeship predominantly take? Where do they go?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Could that also be solved by directing more funding to apprenticeships, rather than by finding those places in businesses?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
You said in your report that the recommendations
“form a package of public service reform, which ... would need to be implemented in full”
to be successful. The Government response to the report was that it is
“minded to follow the direction of travel that it outlines”.
Those two are not necessarily the same. How confident are you that the recommendations will be implemented in full? What are your concerns about the impact that it might have if they are not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I will not make any comment on that.
Was the financial side part of the remit, or was it excluded from it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
It is about how it is sliced.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I think that there is an acceptance that the visitor levy is likely to happen, or certainly that it could happen. However, most of the concerns that has been raised with me have been about the legislation that went through this Parliament. For example, there are concerns about the levy being a percentage rather than a flat rate; about the fact that VAT will be charged on it; and about how the levy will be collected, which will essentially turn businesses into tax collectors. All those things have come from this Parliament and not from the councils in Highland, Argyll, Moray or wherever.
Do you have concerns about implementation of the levy? How could the new deal for business group have played a role in making sure that the legislation was right as it came through Parliament?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
To be clear, then, are you happy with the legislation that came through this Parliament?
10:45