The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 766 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I will come in—I was pondering whether to. I will ask a question that follows on from what Gordon MacDonald asked. Again, it should probably go to Zoe Laird in the first instance, and it goes back to the questions that I asked about repurposing.
Small and medium-sized businesses in particular look for security and consistency. If you repurpose money out of, say, IT infrastructure, that might affect organisations that have built up their workforces to meet that need. Funds might be diverted to a much-needed new ferry, but there might be no or limited involvement from local companies in building that ferry or doing some of the other infrastructure work. How is that considered when repurposing or reprofiling is done? Are you aware of any impact?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Okay.
On the regional deals, I have a particular example that I used last week when we had the cabinet secretary in. Money for the Corran Narrows crossing and the Corran ferry has been repurposed or reprofiled—I am not sure of the technical term—from the deal to cover infrastructure. The previous UK Government announced that and the Scottish Government has done the same for the new electric ferry. Do you have any concerns about the impact that that might have on the overall objectives of city or regional deals? We recognise that circumstances and situations will change, but what concerns do you have, given that they were brought in with particular objectives and they are being changed?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I am a Highlands and Islands MSP and ferries are a big part of what I do and what I focus on. On the Fair Isle ferry announcement, there has been a large increase in costs and the council has made a decision to fund some of that increase in costs itself. Were there discussions between the Shetland Islands Council and the Scottish Government on perhaps covering some of that additional cost? The original project was going to be around £30 million; it is now £40 million to £45 million.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
The deadline was also a concern at the time. Has that been reviewed and has there been support and movement on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I am interested because we were talking about how the funding flows.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
My question is for Zoe Laird. You talked briefly about the repurposing of money for the Corran ferry. I have been a strong advocate of getting that situation sorted out. In the past, such investment would have been dealt with by councils and the Scottish Government. Do you have concerns that some of the money for the growth deal is being moved away from what was originally intended? What impact does that have on the deal being able to meet its overall objectives, particularly on connectivity? There were concerns about potential overlap between UK and Scottish Government schemes. Has that meant that the original objectives on connectivity have not been met, or are you fairly confident that they will be met but that it might take longer?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Good morning. On that point, I have a technical question. Does the money from the towns fund and the levelling-up funding go directly to the relevant councils, or does it have to go via the Scottish Government?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Not necessarily with your cabinet secretary hat on, but with your Deputy FM hat on, are you, as a member of the Government, confident that the Government can meet that need through the budget and perhaps through changes to planning regulations and so on, or are there still concerns, given that we are under huge pressure already and that demand will only increase?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Are those perhaps larger businesses that have been in emergency situations?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Why pause it, then, if it is successful and very valuable? The sum of £1.6 million is not a huge amount of money. The Parliament spent £3 million on its website alone. It is a tiny amount of money, and it seems odd to pause the programme if it has been successful.