The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 766 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
It is to clarify an issue, convener. You said that Scottish ministers were not involved in the original decision to lend. Were reassurances received either directly from ministers or via CSL that the scheme would go ahead that might have influenced you, for example, in considering the second draw down?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I was interested to hear what you were saying to Maggie Chapman about the importance of geographic and rural distribution. As a Highlands and Islands MSP, I know that that is very important to my region. The broadband issue brought up nicely the question that I was going to ask. You are obviously supporting a roll-out, as is Highlands and Islands Enterprise, the Scottish Government and the UK Government. There are lots of different organisations involved, so co-ordination and working together are key. In what one of my colleagues and others have described as the cluttered landscape of public lenders, how do you make sure that that co-ordination, collaboration and working together are done? There needs to be work done with local authorities as well—there are so many organisations out there. How do you make sure that that is done?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I would be grateful if you could provide the information on the money being drawn down.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Good morning, and congratulations on your appointment to your new role, Mr Denholm. I have a number of questions. I will make them quite quick—some are just for information.
You have referred to the money as a debt facility, but also as a loan. Is it the straightforward case that the £9 million is with Circularity Scotland? Was it money that it could draw down on or has it all gone to it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Is there any from other organisations that you have been involved with?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Monday?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
You have a number of older cases open, and I think that you have covered how you are looking to clear some of that backlog. You probably will not hit 100 per cent, but when do you expect to have cleared the majority of those cases?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Are you confident that you will achieve that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Therefore, those cases are not urgent. There will not be much of an impact, in the sense that the cases that are being left are historical cases.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jamie Halcro Johnston
On that, it is important to engage with your customers and look for that feedback, particularly on the business side, but across all sides. I think that there are 2,435 cases open from 2007. You would expect that a higher proportion of those customers might be less satisfied—let us put it positively—than is the case for the 20,598 cases that are open from 2019. I take it that you would expect a higher proportion of customers with those earlier cases to be dissatisfied because of the time that has passed, so why do you not collect that information?
10:30