The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 766 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I have a follow-up point to Edward Mountain’s comments that relates to amendments 138 and 139.
Methods for taking or killing wild birds are legal and already adhere to high standards of animal welfare. Amendments 130 to 139 risk sowing confusion and ambiguity for no discernible public benefit. Given the significant and immediate consequences of failing to comply with a statutory code of practice, the contents of the code must provide absolute legal certainty and leave no room for confusion. Trapping infrastructure employed on grouse moors is already compliant with the international agreement on humane trapping standards.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I want to go back to the issues around the enterprise bodies and economic growth. When you appeared before the committee in January, I asked you about the cuts to the budgets for Highlands and Islands Enterprise and South of Scotland Enterprise, and you suggested that they would focus their attention on key priorities. You also talked about key things that matter, key priorities for delivery, key interventions and key sectors for growth. Earlier, in response to the convener, you talked about the enterprise agencies prioritising funding and taking a careful and targeted approach.
However, we still do not know the detail of what you think their priorities and key focuses will be. Their budgets have been cut. What are you looking for them to deliver and what will they now be unable to deliver, given your statement about their important role in driving economic growth?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I would hope that they would be doing things to the best of their ability anyway.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I want to move on to the rural affairs budget and agriculture funding, and at this point, I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests in relation to agriculture.
You do not mention this issue in your response, because although we mentioned it in our report, we did not make a recommendation on it. Cuts have been made to the rural affairs budget, and the £33 million of ring-fenced agriculture funding that was identified as part of the Bew review has not been allocated back to the budget. Do you know yet when it will be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
I apologise for interrupting, but do you have a timescale for when that funding has to be returned by?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
But you have reduced funding in the rural affairs budget. You argue that we cannot find a use for that money in the rural affairs budget, but you have cut that budget.
On the point that I was really asking about, why should a local authority that receives ring-fenced funding from the Scottish Government for certain parts of its public service delivery not say, “If the Scottish Government can use ring-fenced funding for what it wants to do, why shouldn’t we do the same, given the budget pressures that we are under?”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Given what you have said today and previously, do you accept that our key enterprise bodies—Highlands and Islands Enterprise and South of Scotland Enterprise—will be less able to drive economic growth and support businesses than they have in previous years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
Taking on board what you have said about prioritising in areas where we have made cuts, I think that we accept that the enterprise agencies are going to be less effective and less efficient at driving economic growth. As the committee’s report highlights, the question is: how will you monitor the impact of the cuts on their ability to deliver economic growth?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
When you set the budget again next year, you will have reduced expectations of what the agencies are going to be able to deliver. This is not the first cut: the enterprise bodies have faced cuts for a number of years. How will we not get into what is essentially a spiral of enterprise bodies setting targets with reduced budgets, delivering less—even if, as you might argue, they deliver it better—and their budgets continuing to be cut, because you are expecting them to deliver less?
12:30Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Jamie Halcro Johnston
All right. Thanks very much.
We all accept that economic growth is vital for jobs and our economy, but it is also vital for taxes. How do you respond to the comments that Sandy Begbie of Scottish Financial Enterprise made at the weekend when he said that the Scottish Government’s tax policy is making Scotland a “dangerous place” in which to create wealth?