The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 693 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Correct me if I am wrong, but you said that coercion happens prior to the person having an assisted death. If that person goes through with the process and it is found later on that there was coercion, surely that is the offence. If coercion is caught prior to the death, the person would be prevented from dying in the first place. Surely the offence is after the death.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I have a short question on definitions in the bill, relating to what qualifies as a terminal illness and the act of self-administration, for example. What we mean by self-administration is another area that has been quite thoroughly looked at during our evidence taking. Under the bill, we assume that it would mean ingestion of some concoction, but we have also looked at what that would mean for the human rights of somebody who cannot swallow and who might have to go down another route. In relation to that, if something went wrong, what would be the legal requirement on the medical professional who was there at the time? Would they have to step in and save the person’s life? That is a grey area that worries me, Mr Johnson.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
In that case, would there also be the potential for coercion to prevent somebody from having an assisted death? Would that be an offence?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
One of the main concerns around the bill is that, currently, one in four people does not have access to appropriate palliative care, which might influence their decision on whether to access assisted dying. Cabinet secretary, from your perception and in the Scottish Government’s estimation, is palliative care good enough, or are you also concerned that lack of access to palliative care might have an impact on the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
No, I completely understand.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
If coercion is not currently an offence, I presume that it would become an offence within the context of the bill. We would be asking members of the medical profession, who are not members of the legal profession, to make a judgment on something that might break the law. Is that a fair comment?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
One of the big wins from this bill—if “wins” is the word that I am looking for—is that it is shining a light on palliative care provision and the need for it to be equitable across the country. If you look back at some of the evidence that we have heard, you will see the concern with regard to palliative care and the potential for some people to consider assisted dying because of inadequate palliative care in their particular instance. I ask you to have a look at that, because it is a big concern for me. I would like to think—and I am sure that you will agree with me—that, if the bill were to be passed, everybody who wished to consider assisted dying could also access palliative care, that the matter would be raised by a GP or whatever at the time and that provision would be equitable.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I appreciate that answer, cabinet secretary. Presumably, given what you just alluded to, if the bill is amended to include mandatory access to palliative care for anybody who is considering assisted dying—that is to say, that they must be offered palliative care at the same time—the Government would support a financial resolution to ensure that the bill could go ahead as amended.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Having taken evidence from other jurisdictions, I would argue that that is not the case. Some people in other jurisdictions have said that the lack of palliative care is a contributory factor, especially for those people in poor communities who have the disadvantage of having less access to palliative care. That issue will have to be addressed.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Would you accept that, for those people who are moving towards the end of their life, the option of palliative care should be there—which it currently is not for a lot of people—at the same time as the option of assisted dying?