The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 916 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Brian Whittle
What is driving demand for non-surgical procedures? How does advertising and body-image pressures influence that? Are the pressures more acute for the younger generation—those who are under 18? Would potentially limiting such procedures to those aged 18-plus mitigate that? When it comes to advertising cosmetic procedures, how do you manage unrealistic expectations?
Louise Caithness, do you want to come in?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Brian Whittle
But you would be able to record that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Brian Whittle
I want to ask about how we regulate advertising, what is driving the demand for non-surgical procedures and whether people, especially those in the younger generation, are being realistic about potential outcomes.
There are potentially mental health issues in that regard. The previous witnesses made an interesting point when they said that that would be taken into account as part of training—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Brian Whittle
They said that there are operators out there who are operating exactly in the way that they should be. The ethics issue is not black and white.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Brian Whittle
Good morning. I just want to extend that line of questioning a little bit. I completely accept that there are those in the industry who deliver a proper and thorough service, as opposed to those whom we are considering, but my concern is that healthcare, as a science, is inexact. We never know when, or why, a complication might arise.
Surely, therefore, it is important to have a medically trained person on the premises, specifically to deal with any complications that are not foreseen. Why would you not have a medical professional on site for that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Brian Whittle
Four out of 100.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Brian Whittle
We are talking about four out of 100 people, in relation to one of the most basic procedures. I am not here to give you a hard time—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Brian Whittle
That was my next question.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Brian Whittle
That is why it is so important that the practitioners are held to a high standard, because they are ultimately the ones who can say yea or nay to a procedure.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Brian Whittle
I want to dig into that a bit, because these ideas have been around since the 2011 Christie report. It is hardly groundbreaking to say that, if we continue to follow a diet of ultra-processed foods—foods high in sugar and salt—we will be unhealthy or unhealthier. My concern is that, instead of looking at how we can promote a better diet and physical activity, especially in youth, we seem to be looking at how to prevent people from accessing ultra-processed foods. How do we encourage a healthier lifestyle? The regulations are all about banning stuff. I absolutely agree with prevention in marketing, but where is the balance in the legislation?