The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 693 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I want to clarify a point about advance directives. Am I correct in understanding that you are saying that the problem with advance directives is that, when someone gets to a certain stage in relation to capacity, it is very difficult to understand whether they might have changed their mind on that journey? Are you saying that that is an inherent issue with advance directives, or am I misconstruing you?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I am listening to the witnesses—you are obviously very passionate in your views, Tressa. However, I am wondering whether your comments are not so much about the bill but more about the way in which society—and Governments, potentially—currently treat disability and disabled people in terms of access to services. Would it be fair to say that it is more a comment on that, rather than specifically about the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Does that have the potential to influence somebody’s decision on whether to access assisted dying?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
We have looked at the issue for a number of years. Generally speaking, the standards to which the UK holds itself are probably not as high as I would like them to be, but they tend to be higher than is the case in much of the European Union. However, it would be appropriate to double-check that that is still the case. As colleagues have said, it would be appropriate to defer the decision on the instrument.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Good morning. My question is supplementary to David Torrance’s questions. I listened to what was said, and I want to clarify something. On testing for capacity, is there the potential for medical staff whose job it is to determine capacity, no matter how well trained they are, to come to a conclusion that is different from that of the person’s GP, who has seen them consistently over a period of time and who understands the individual’s specific condition? Is there a concern that there could be two different conclusions on capacity?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
The witnesses have spoken passionately and eloquently about the lack of rights for the disability community, and about concerns around the impact that the bill would have on that community. They have highlighted strongly how society is currently not necessarily giving the disability community the services that they deserve and to which they have the right.
There is a flipside to that—I will offer the devil’s advocate’s view, if you like. You may have an objection to the bill because of the way in which society treats the disabled community, and because you feel that disability rights would be eroded. What about the rights of those people who—as my colleague Sandesh Gulhane highlighted—are suffering long term, in the way that the bill is intended to address, and who are currently looking to go to Switzerland or whatever to access that end-of-life option? Is there not a case that, in protecting disabled rights, we are eroding the rights of others?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Brian Whittle
Good morning, cabinet secretary. In answer to my colleague Mr Sweeney’s question about the allocation of funding, you touched on the fact that, sometimes, the way that funding is allocated makes it hard to see where it goes. That is one of the main criticisms. In such a huge budget, it is very difficult to follow the money. Is it not about time that we got to a position where we understand where the money is spent? It cannot be right that £21 billion of public funding goes into the NHS, and we do not know where it has gone.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Brian Whittle
I have a final question. We have moved away from a situation in which, roughly speaking, a third of the budget went to health and a third of it went to councils. Obviously, the health budget has increased dramatically, while the local government budget has decreased dramatically and health outcomes have become increasingly poor. I have talked about preventative health in the Parliament for the best part of a decade, and the situation has not improved.
The cabinet secretary says that he is keen to move towards a preventative health agenda, but one of the issues that we face is the lack of data to measure progress in that respect. How will the Scottish Government measure the impact of a preventative health agenda on the Scottish population?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Brian Whittle
Surely prevention is about reducing the need for people to seek medical interventions.