Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 22 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 5477 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

Before we go any further, I think that we need to put the discussion into context. The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee has suggested that

“under regulation 2(4) the instrument keeps the rate of payments under the Less Favoured Area Support Scheme at the current rate (which is the rate that applied in 2018) until 2030.”

Is that the case or not, minister?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

Just to get this on the record—this is a question for you, minister—do you agree with the DPLR Committee that the instrument keeps the rate of payment the same as that applied in 2018? Is that your understanding?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

But that is what we are deciding today.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

That is a decision for the committee, not the minister, but thank you for putting that on the record.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

The question is: why should the date be 2030? If we assume that there will be some changes to the rate, why should it not be 2025 or 2026? Why should it be 2030 at the 2018 rates?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

Thank you, minister. Do members have questions?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

Yes, your key priorities.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

In relation to the overall budget, basically, the budget for sea fisheries has flatlined. There has been no real-terms increase compared with other parts of the marine directorate. You mentioned the route map, but there was a suggestion that it was based on the budget, rather than on what the industry needs. The committee has dealt with policies in relation to which issues have been raised about the data to back up those policies.

There have been struggles with the Clyde cod box and, more recently, with lobster and crab fisheries. Are you ensuring that the budget matches the ambitions that Nuala Gormley has just set out? Can that be achieved when the budget for sea fisheries is flatlining?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

Cabinet secretary, I accept your apology for the lateness of the letter, but in some instances, sadly, it raises more questions than it answers. You outline the £620.7 million of ring-fenced money, but there is no indication of the Scottish Government’s contribution to the overall budget. It would be helpful to know that so that we can see the make-up of the portfolio budget.

I note that the letter says:

“the Bew review recommendations have not been fully implemented.”

Which recommendations have not been implemented?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Finlay Carson

I do not have that in front of me, but we have certainly heard witnesses suggest that the level of fines is not a deterrent.