The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5477 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Before we go any further, I think that we need to put the discussion into context. The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee has suggested that
“under regulation 2(4) the instrument keeps the rate of payments under the Less Favoured Area Support Scheme at the current rate (which is the rate that applied in 2018) until 2030.”
Is that the case or not, minister?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Just to get this on the record—this is a question for you, minister—do you agree with the DPLR Committee that the instrument keeps the rate of payment the same as that applied in 2018? Is that your understanding?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
But that is what we are deciding today.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
That is a decision for the committee, not the minister, but thank you for putting that on the record.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
The question is: why should the date be 2030? If we assume that there will be some changes to the rate, why should it not be 2025 or 2026? Why should it be 2030 at the 2018 rates?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Thank you, minister. Do members have questions?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Yes, your key priorities.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
In relation to the overall budget, basically, the budget for sea fisheries has flatlined. There has been no real-terms increase compared with other parts of the marine directorate. You mentioned the route map, but there was a suggestion that it was based on the budget, rather than on what the industry needs. The committee has dealt with policies in relation to which issues have been raised about the data to back up those policies.
There have been struggles with the Clyde cod box and, more recently, with lobster and crab fisheries. Are you ensuring that the budget matches the ambitions that Nuala Gormley has just set out? Can that be achieved when the budget for sea fisheries is flatlining?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Cabinet secretary, I accept your apology for the lateness of the letter, but in some instances, sadly, it raises more questions than it answers. You outline the £620.7 million of ring-fenced money, but there is no indication of the Scottish Government’s contribution to the overall budget. It would be helpful to know that so that we can see the make-up of the portfolio budget.
I note that the letter says:
“the Bew review recommendations have not been fully implemented.”
Which recommendations have not been implemented?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
I do not have that in front of me, but we have certainly heard witnesses suggest that the level of fines is not a deterrent.