The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5477 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Excellent. That completes consideration of the affirmative instrument. I thank the cabinet secretary and her officials for attending.
09:30 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
We will move to our next theme, on forestry.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Before I bring in Susan Davies, I have a quick question. Professor Austin, you mentioned bottom trawling, which is an emotive point—you might regret mentioning it. You suggested that there was some evidence that the bottom trawling industry emits as much carbon as aviation, but you said that that was a weak argument. That is an issue in which science is crucial in ensuring that we address the big-ticket issues rather than the ones that produce an emotive response.
With regard to blue carbon, there are the physical disturbances that we have discussed and there is climate change, as well as land use and land management changes. Exactly how critical in that equation is physical disturbance in comparison with other climate change factors with regard to carbon dioxide in the ocean, the ability to sequestrate carbon dioxide and whether we are at the tipping point for that changing? Just how important is physical disturbance in the big picture?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
For a final word on that question, we will hear from Bill Austin.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
We move on to the theme of marine protection and enhancement. Ariane will kick things off.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Is there anybody in particular that you would like to address the question to, Ariane?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Is Rob Brooker coming in?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
That takes us smoothly on to our second theme, which is peatlands and soils.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Is there a suggestion that, at the moment, renewables sector developers might be greenwashing by saying, “We might be displacing peat here, but we will restore it somewhere else”?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
We are lucky to have two experts from the James Hutton Institute with us, so I will bring in Rob Brooker at this point.
From knowledge gained, as I have said, many years ago in the soil science department of Aberdeen University, I know that microbiology plays a huge role in this matter. The more artificial nitrogen we use, the less we rely on the microbes in the soil to fix It; in other words, microbiological and other matter in the soil is very good at allowing plants to take up nutrients, and the more artificial fertiliser we use, the less we rely on those microbes. As a result, reducing the use of artificial fertiliser has the regenerative effect of allowing these microbes to do their job again, and there is a tipping point at which the return on investment in terms of yield through the use of artificial fertiliser reduces. You do not get as big a bang for your buck, so to speak.
If that is correct, should the science be helping farmers with the decision to reduce their use of nitrogen and artificial fertilisers, given that, after a period, productivity that might have fallen will increase as the microbes in the soil start to do their job again? Again, this brings us back to the transition issue, but does part of the solution lie in knowledge transfer from you guys—the scientists—to grass-roots farmers to persuade them that doing things differently will not, in the long term, affect their bottom line and economic sustainability?
I am just seeing whether anyone is nodding. Would Pete Smith like to respond to that? [Interruption.] I beg your pardon—I had said that Rob Brooker would respond.