The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5477 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Finlay Carson
I absolutely appreciate that. That is not a problem, but what is unclear at the moment is when the Scottish Government got the notification. The Scottish Parliament and the committee got the notification only on 7 December. We can ask for clarification on when the Scottish Government got the notification. Does that make things clearer?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Finlay Carson
It is unclear whether the UK Government was late in sending the notification. I do not have that date.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Finlay Carson
My understanding is that we do not know why the instrument is urgent. We have not been given the full 28 days, so I intend to write to the Scottish Government to ask why the SI is urgent and why an extra few days, which would have allowed us to scrutinise it properly, have not been given. As I have said, it is unclear when the Scottish Government received the policy proposal in the instrument, and the Scottish Government notified the Scottish Parliament late. That is what we need to clarify. In the letter, I will ask why the SI is urgent and what impact on trade relations an extra few days would make.
10:15Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Finlay Carson
You are talking about a different SI, Jim.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Finlay Carson
The SI in front of us was sent to the Scottish Parliament on 7 December with the intent of its being laid in Westminster on 16 December. We can write to the Scottish Government to ask why the Parliament was notified of it only on 7 December. When the Scottish Government got the SI from the UK Government is unclear to me at the moment. That is my understanding.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Finlay Carson
That is fine. Pat Snowdon would like to come in.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Finlay Carson
I am sorry, but Jim Fairlie wants to intervene.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Finlay Carson
I have a supplementary question. Traditionally, and at the moment, farmers are carbon farmers, nature farmers, food farmers, cultural farmers, soil farmers and tech farmers all at the same time—they have to have regard to all those matters. Some pay more regard to food production than to nature; for others, it is the other way round. In the future, will that broad spectrum of responsibilities be spread as they are now, with farmers taking responsibility, to varying degrees, for all aspects of land management, or will regional land use partnerships and so on specify areas that should focus on food production or on protecting crested newts, for example? How do you see everything coming together to deliver the biodiversity and climate change recovery that we need?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Finlay Carson
Over the past few weeks, the damage that has been done by storms has been very clear. Thousands of hectares of trees have been flattened. Some argue that those trees have been planted in the wrong place—for example, on good farmland.
How should we properly account for natural capital, given that we are seeing what is potentially a bit of a land grab, in that, in order to do a bit of greenwashing, big commercial companies are buying land, some of which is of very high value in terms of agricultural production, and planting trees? Do we need to rapidly have a baseline and look again at how we classify land to ensure that some of our best agricultural land is not turned into forestry? Is that part of what we need to do to assess our natural capital?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Finlay Carson
You talk about not pausing, but we are already seeing extortionate prices for agricultural land that would normally be passed on to the next generation of farmers or new entrants—it is being snapped up for planting. We have also heard about wind farms potentially being put on peatland. You say that we should not pause, but do we need to do more work to ensure that we do not go too far down the road and then have 25,000 hectares of inappropriate planting of Sitka spruce and so on? Maybe “pause” is not the right word, but do we need to go back and ensure that we are doing the right thing?
Dr Snowdon, we often hear the phrase “the right tree in the right place”. How is Scottish Forestry ensuring that we are doing far more than that and looking at the long-term consequences of actions that we take now?