The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5477 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
We go back to Shetland and Beatrice Wishart.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
My apologies, Elena, for interrupting you. Please continue with your line of questioning.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
On the 48-month timescale, four years is a long lead-in time for the new standards. Was that timescale chosen, in conjunction with industry, to address their capacity to introduce new thermolicer boats or freshwater treatment? What discussions were held with the industry and what was said about its inability to respond more quickly? Four years seems like quite an extended period.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
Thank you.
We have up until about 11.30 for questions, so there is plenty of time. I will kick off.
Our first theme is the economic and social benefit of aquaculture. How is the Scottish Government ensuring that community benefits and employment from salmon farms are maximised?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
We heard in a previous evidence session from SEPA, which has produced a finfish agriculture sector plan. Its objectives include that:
“communities are confident that the environment is protected by being well informed and engaged with businesses operating on their land and waters”,
and that
“communities have a high level of trust towards regulators and businesses and benefit from open and transparent dialogue.”
Up to now, in our discussions with stakeholders and communities, those things do not seem to be the case. When do you expect SEPA to deliver those outcomes, given how important it is that communities are fully engaged with industry?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
Our next item of business is the final evidence session of our follow-up inquiry into salmon farming in Scotland.
I welcome to the meeting Mairi Gougeon, Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands, and her officials from the marine directorate: Charles Allan, senior delivery lead, aquaculture, fish health and biosecurity; Jill Barber, senior delivery lead, aquaculture programme; and Hazel Bartels, senior delivery lead, aquaculture programme.
I also welcome Edward Mountain MSP, who will be taking part in the discussion. Before we begin, I invite him to declare any relevant interests.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
I call Rhoda Grant.
10:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
They are covered?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
Well, it is good to get that on the record.
We move to a question from Tim Eagle.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Finlay Carson
I am sorry to interrupt, but what is your benchmark for a rate of 25 per cent? What makes a 25 per cent mortality rate okay but 35 per cent not okay, or 15 per cent not good enough? How are you benchmarking that, given that the public perception is that the life cycle of fish is completely different from the life cycle of a cow or a chicken, or whatever? Why is it okay to lose 17 million fish?