The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5447 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
It is not the process of the consultation that is the issue here. At no point during the consultation was it suggested that the rules under which the national park might operate would change. That is the issue. There was no opportunity for constituents to respond to the fact that the rules under which their area might have to operate will change.
It is not an ideal situation; it is not an ideal scenario that the two things are working in parallel. One should have been done before the other. The Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill, with the national park changes, would preferably have become legislation before a new national park was consulted on, surely.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
Okay. Thank you. We move to our next topic with a question from Elena Whitham.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
What is the difference from the previous powers in the 1972 act?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
Will all the other powers sunset apart from the ones that you have mentioned? Will they be lost?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
On a practical basis, how can landowners or land managers protect themselves and ensure that they are not subject to an intervention? The scope of the target is extremely wide and covers many different areas. Someone might have a piece of land that could be managed for preservation of internationally recognised peat bogs, heather or various species, but that might be at odds with promoting woodland enhancement. How are you going to decide what features are going to be the prominent features that you want to protect? How can landowners ensure that, as they go about their day-to-day work, they do not inadvertently trigger a legal intervention on the basis that they are preserving nature or a certain species in a way that NatureScot or whoever does not agree with?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
In practice, that could mean fining someone who sets up a barbecue or campfire during a certain period in the year when that could be dangerous. Is that the sort of practical implication?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
That concludes our questions absolutely bang on time. Thank you very much for joining us and for your succinct and informative responses to our questions.
I suspend the meeting for 15 minutes, after which we will look at part 4 of the bill.
10:30 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
I ask for clarity on exactly where the responsibility lies. The bill states that, if a deer notice is to be issued, it is to be issued to the landowner and/or the manager. If a landowner has an agreement in place, whether that is a tenancy, a stalking licence or shooting rights, is the notice issued to the people with the stalking or shooting rights or to the tenant? By default, if there is no agreement in place, does the responsibility land with the landowner?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
I am still unclear. If I own a piece of land and have a tenancy agreement in place, and if deer that are on my property cause road accidents, stray into another area or eat trees, where does the responsibility sit? In the absence of some agreement about who is responsible—it might be the tenant or the person who has the shooting rights—does it default to the landowner?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Finlay Carson
I will bring in Ariane Burgess to ask a supplementary question on the response to Elena Whitham’s question. After that, I will bring in Tim Eagle and then Emma Harper.