The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1153 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Emma Harper
I know that vaccination will be on-going, and a new variant has now appeared: XBB.1.5. As I was part of the vaccination programme in NHS Dumfries and Galloway, I was able to learn a lot about the different vaccines that were produced. Is it reasonable for the UK Government just to terminate the funding, rather than, as you say, having a phased reduction?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Emma Harper
Thanks for bringing me back in, convener. I am interested in picking up David Torrance’s initial point on preventative spend. I know that there is cross-portfolio budgeting and that a lot of the health and social care budget goes direct to local authorities. Some of it also goes to the third sector, and I will give an example of that. I have done work with the charity Beat, which received £400,000 from the Scottish Government to support its work to help people with eating disorders. Given that some of the health and social care budget goes to other bodies, including to local authorities—£35,000 goes to each local authority to look at developing an autism strategy, for example—is it difficult to track and evaluate the effectiveness of that funding?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Emma Harper
I have a final wee question about the cross-portfolio issue. Just before the Christmas recess, Richard Lochhead, the Minister for Just Transition, Employment and Fair Work, took a question in the chamber about the autism spectrum employment gap. He spoke about the support that is being provided to people. That reflects cross-portfolio requirements to support budgets.
However, sometimes, it is difficult to trace where a specific budget comes from. In that case, does the budget come from your portfolio or from the education and skills portfolio, for example? I am interested in peeling apart the complexities of the budget, and that is the cross-portfolio issue that I wanted to raise.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Emma Harper
Okay—thanks.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Emma Harper
Okay. Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Emma Harper
I have a couple of questions on the establishment of care boards. There are sections in the bill on
“Establishment and abolition of care boards”,
on
“Directions to care boards”
and on
“Removal of care board members”.
I am interested to hear how we will move forward on developing care boards, who will be on them and whether they will be commissioning or delivery bodies or a bit of both.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Emma Harper
I have a wee quick question. In evidence to the committee, Karen Hedge of Scottish Care expressed concerns that
“care boards ... might just be recreating a system that”—[Official Report, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, 29 November 2022; c 8.]
already exists. We have also heard folk talking about moving the deck chairs around.
I seek clarity that the bill is about establishing a care system that will benefit personally the people on the ground who have been asking for better care and support for themselves.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Emma Harper
I have a quick question on breaks for carers. In last week’s evidence, it was mentioned that what is sufficient for one person might differ from what is sufficient for another, so I am interested in following up on that. The bill talks about defining “sufficient breaks”. It says:
“Regulations under subsection (2) may in particular make provision about—
(a) the meaning of any reference to sufficient breaks in this Act,
(b) standards or criteria in relation to the sufficiency of such breaks (including the nature, frequency or duration of breaks)”.
At last week’s cross-party group on health inequalities, Richard Meade gave a presentation and we talked a bit about breaks. Susan Chambers, from Pasda, which is an East Lothian support group for people with autism, also spoke at the meeting.
What are your thoughts on the issue of sufficient breaks? I am not sure that further detail is needed in the bill if the matter can be dealt with through regulations.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Emma Harper
I will ask a short question, after which I am happy to move on, but I am sure that I will pick up on stuff later.
People have given us evidence that we should fix the situation now. They have said that we should not pursue the national care service at this point because we need to act to fix the system now. They have asked why we would waste so much money—£1.5 billion—on massive structural reform for a national care service, rather than fixing the current situation. How do you respond to that, minister?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Emma Harper
We have heard people talk about co-design and co-production. They are often used interchangeably, but we know that co-design is actually different from co-production. What is co-design, in terms of shaping the national care service bill?