Seòmar agus comataidhean

Okay—thank you.

We have talked about preventative spend, better outcomes and better health overall.

An example that comes to mind is how we keep people out of hospital in relation to asthma attacks or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. An overnight stay in hospital costs a minimum of £1,100. However, renewing a person’s annual asthma plan and ensuring that people use their inhalers appropriately—whether they have COPD or asthma—can help to keep people out of hospital. Such support from a practice nurse or specialist in airway management and respiratory issues has to happen in primary care. Does that mean that we must take money away from secondary care and give it to primary care? Do we get an extra pot of money from somewhere?

Do we have a wee borrowing pot? Oh no, we do not, because we cannae borrow in Scotland. What is the best way to divvy up a pot of money?

On the back of Tess White’s question for Professor Bell—I will be quick—I have a question about recruitment and retention, and the plans for clinical training and career pathways for health and social care workers. The Scottish Government has introduced bursaries for training of nurses, midwives and paramedics, and there is free university tuition in Scotland. I think that that will help recruitment, as well. Should anything else be done or introduced, in addition to the bursaries that have been introduced already, to support further recruitment and retention, and to encourage some of the people who have left the healthcare environment to return?

I picked up from Dr Bell’s submission that a review is being undertaken of the NHS Scotland resource allocation committee—NRAC—formula and that certain recommendations have been asked for in relation to the way in which funding is allocated. I am thinking about remote and rural areas, whether those are in the Highlands and Islands or in the south of Scotland. What, if anything, needs to be changed in the NRAC formula?

Okay. Thanks for that. I will halt there.

Thank you.

I remember an anaesthetist telling me that people used to smoke right under the windows of the ear, nose and throat ward so, when she woke from her anaesthesia fog after a tonsillectomy, she smelled cigarette smoke. I therefore welcome the instrument.

As the co-convener of the cross-party group on lung health—and a nurse—I am keen to hear what measures are being taken to help health boards, local authorities and health and social care partnerships to educate people about the legislation, so that it is easier to enforce as we move forward.

Will you confirm again the go-live date? Did you say that it was 8 September?

Good morning, minister, and good morning, Mr Kellet. I am interested in the issue of cross-portfolio working, because, as you have said, the austerity being inflicted on Scotland is costing £770 million a year at the moment. You have also said that we do not have all the levers that we need to tackle health inequalities. As a public health minister, can you tell us what work is being done in other parts of the Government and in other portfolios to tackle these inequalities?

Those challenges are not just urban; they are also rural, and you are a rural MSP, like I am. Is specific work being done to consider housing or other wider issues to help raise awareness of health inequalities in rural areas?