The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1350 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
We are talking about diagnosing people. I want to highlight that there is an overlap sometimes—people can have both autism and ADHD—so you cannae just pigeonhole people into one diagnosis.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
I am thinking about referral processes. Our briefing papers mention that, in its evidence to us, the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists referenced the use of open referral. It said:
“Fife and Dumfries & Galloway, which both have strong”
speech and language therapy
“representation in the pathway leadership teams, are excellent examples of good multidisciplinary collaboration”.
I am interested to hear about the advantages or disadvantages of open referral in neurodevelopment diagnosis, assessment and support.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
I will pick up on the shared care approach. Does there need to be a once for Scotland approach? Dr Williams, you talked about governance, good practice, national guidelines and a national approach. Do we need to move forward in that way if we are going to have a shared care model where private healthcare is supporting the NHS, or vice versa?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
You said that Healthcare Improvement Scotland does the governance checking of who is doing assessments, but not everybody is validated in relation to good practice. Would Healthcare Improvement Scotland be a way to make sure that governance and good practice is widespread across the whole of Scotland?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
Even just giving people a heads-up to whether there is a quiet space that they can go to can be quite affirming if somebody has issues.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Emma Harper
Yes, I was conscious that Louise Bussell has not spoken.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Emma Harper
Does a more accurate assessment of socioeconomic impact need to be conducted, or is what has been done accurate enough to convey the potential impacts?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Emma Harper
Thanks very much for coming in this morning. I asked our earlier witnesses about the socioeconomic impacts of introducing the MPA regulations. In submissions that it has received, the committee has heard of concerns about job losses, displacement of fishing activities and economic harm. Keith Whyte also mentioned the effects on our economy.
I am interested to hear your thoughts on the anticipated economic impacts of the proposed measures on your local fishing communities. Do the socioeconomic assessments used in the consultation accurately reflect the potential impacts?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Emma Harper
Is option 1 the zonal approach?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning to you all. I have a couple of questions about socioeconomic impact. Some of the respondents highlighted the potential of negative effects on coastal communities and local economies if restrictions were too broad and not carefully targeted. In our papers, West Coast Sea Products was in favour of a zonal approach, which it said was
“sensible in ensuring PMFs”—
priority marine features—
“of relevance shall be protected.”
I am interested to hear from you about concerns that full-site closures could lead to displacement of fishing activities and adverse effects on coastal communities.