Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 12 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1534 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Emma Harper

The Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, of which I am a member, has discussed non-communicable diseases. Some 32 per cent of people in Scotland are obese, we have challenges with type 2 diabetes and we have kids who are not as tall as kids in other European countries because of malnourishment. If we approve the regulations today, that will allow the necessary cross-Government portfolio working to take place, given that the issues around addressing the food system and supporting a healthier nation are complex. Is it the case that the purpose of the regulations is to enable the cross-portfolio work in Government that is required to tackle the issues that I have listed?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Emma Harper

I remind everybody that I am a registered nurse and that surgery was my specialty in clinical education. If safety is your number 1 concern, what do we need to do to make sure that appropriate steps are taken to support people to obtain appropriate qualifications to ensure safety?

There are also consumers who seek invasive non-surgical procedures that are at different levels. How do we support consumers to be better informed?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Emma Harper

I will let others come in, because I am sure that information regarding data, adverse reaction tracking and other such things will be picked up on.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Emma Harper

I have a final question, convener.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Emma Harper

Good morning, all, and thanks for being here. I will kick off. What are your views on the bill and, specifically, on the proposed regulation of non-surgical procedures that has been set out in it?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Emma Harper

I know that there is a hierarchy of procedures ranging from non-invasive to more invasive. Over the weekend, I read about an incident involving eyebrow wax that was so hot, it should not have been applied to the skin, and it burned the person’s eyelids. I know, as a former operating room nurse, that we would check the temperature of the water that we were going to use, the saline for irrigating an open abdomen and so on. We had processes in place.

I am interested in the consent process with regard to risks, benefits and alternatives and the documenting of all that. I might be touching on other people’s questions, but I was wondering about the tracking of those conversations to ensure that consumers are aware of the treatments that they are accessing.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Emma Harper

Good morning to youse. You might have heard some of the first panel’s responses to our questions. This is our first evidence session, so I will open it right up. What are your views on the proposed model of regulating non-surgical procedures, as set out in the bill?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Emma Harper

What role do you think that Healthcare Improvement Scotland or other industry bodies have in setting up safety standards for practitioners who need to be trained, regulated and supported?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 December 2025

Emma Harper

What effect will the bill have on the reputation of the aesthetics industry?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Emma Harper

I will speak to my amendment 57. I believe that the cabinet secretary has always been clear that if the power in section 2(1) were used to make significant changes, the affirmative procedure should apply. I recognise that concerns were raised during the stage 1 debate about the lack of clarity on when the affirmative procedure would apply in respect of regulations made under section 2(1). My amendment has been developed with input from the cabinet secretary to ensure that it reflects the views that were expressed during the scrutiny of part 2 of the bill.

Sarah Boyack’s amendment 8 would introduce the affirmative procedure to cover the power that is provided in part 2 of the bill. However, such a blanket provision requiring the affirmative procedure would not be proportionate or an efficient use of public resources or the Parliament’s time.

I therefore seek support from the committee for my amendment 57, which strikes the right balance, as it would ensure that the affirmative procedure was used for substantive changes while allowing the negative procedure to be used only for clearly minor technical or administrative updates. That approach would maintain robust scrutiny where it was needed without creating unnecessary delays. My amendment reflects the most efficient use of the Parliament’s role in scrutinising legislation.

I therefore ask Sarah Boyack not to move amendment 8, and I ask members to support my amendment 57, which clarifies the procedure in sections 2, 6 and 7 of part 2 of the bill.