The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1153 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Dr Wright, I am processing the information that you gave about whether people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart disease might be considered terminal, as might people with diabetes who struggle because they are in dialysis three times a week or have neuropathic pain or something like that. Are you suggesting that the definition of what constitutes a terminal illness diagnosis is too broad, because it might lead to persons with diabetes, COPD and heart disease being eligible?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
I want to highlight the case of a diet pill that was sold in America and then came to Britain. It has now been relabelled as a poison. That is down to the work that the Food Standards Agency is doing. The diet pill 2,4-dinitrophenol—DNP—is a poison, and it was reclassified in legislation. That is part of the work that you do to highlight certain products, which you might then act to ban or to reclassify, which is what happened in that case. Is that correct?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Dr Wright, I want to pick up on what you said about GPs working behind closed doors. I am a registered nurse and, in my experience, if somebody is given a terminal diagnosis, a multidisciplinary team of specialists will be working with them. That will include haematologists, surgeons, nurse practitioners and physiotherapists—a whole range of specialists will come into contact with the patient. If a patient makes a statement, therefore, in which they say, “I want to end this,” it is not then just going be up to a GP to make a decision behind closed doors.
Quite often, in my experience, if a physician comes to speak to a patient and there is a family member at the bedside, the patient will be asked whether it is okay for the family member to stay or whether they should leave, and it is up to the patient to make that decision. It is about choice and more than one person is making a decision, so I am not sure that I agree that GPs would be working behind closed doors and making a decision in a vacuum with regard to what somebody’s autonomous choice might be. I am thinking about the wider multidisciplinary team and about the decision being part of a care process.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Thanks. I do not want to take over anybody else’s questions, so I will leave it there.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Last week it came up that somebody might have a terminal illness but also have what might be considered to be a mental ill-health issue; the bill talks about the person having a “mental disorder”. However, somebody can have depression then get a terminal illness, too. That is the sort of thing that, down the line, should be addressed in further guidance—the bill supports the development of guidance—so that the assessment of adequate “capacity” can take into account that some people will have co-existing conditions.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
I will pick up on Joe FitzPatrick’s point about the impact of the new US President on products that will be marketed in or brought to this country. The US Food and Drug Administration has the “Food Defect Levels Handbook”, which sets out acceptable levels of defects in food. That allows certain levels of insect parts, mould, mites, dust and even—dare I say it?—rat poo.
We do not have anything like that in Europe or in the UK. I am assuming that the Food Standards Agency and Food Standards Scotland will be horizon scanning for products that might be brought to the market from the USA for instance. I have concerns about the acceptable level of defects in the products that are coming from America.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
I am a type 1 diabetic, and I do not consider myself terminal.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning. Some of your answers will probably be on issues that we have already covered, as social benefits for local people in our areas are all intertwined with the issues that we have been talking about—housing, skills development and the recruitment of apprentices.
I will come to Stuart Goodall, first, on local issues regarding ownership and employment. Forestry coverage in Dumfries and Galloway is 31 per cent. Forestry is a big industry in the south-west of Scotland and you mentioned the south-west in relation to skills. I am interested in hearing about how rural communities in Scotland benefit from forestry and woodland.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Emma Harper
I am an MSP for South Scotland.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Emma Harper
I am looking directly at you because you just said that you are a birder.