The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1282 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Emma Harper
We are not talking about south of the central belt, because, the last time we took evidence, we heard that lowland deer management included Perth, and Perth is not south of the central belt.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Emma Harper
I have a quick thought about the potential for Quality Meat Scotland to be part of the engagement and support of venison as red meat, given that it already provides confidence in beef, lamb and selected pork. Does more work need to be done with Quality Meat Scotland to convey confidence and integrity in the venison food supply chain?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning. You have already touched a little bit on the criteria for managing deer, but I note, for example, that different species of deer occupy the same habitat. NatureScot’s website mentions the deer working group’s recommendation that NatureScot adopt an upper benchmark of 10 red deer per square kilometre; however, that is just in the Highlands, and we know that there are deer in the Borders and in Dumfries and Galloway, and that there are peri-urban deer, too.
What I am seeking to understand is the need for deer management protocols or policies to be flexible, given that different habitats are being occupied and farmland is being affected. Of course, that is all about damage to property rather than peatland restoration. Is there a need for flexibility in the bill to ensure the creation of guidance that would work for the diverse habitat areas that need to be protected and restored? Is that correct?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Emma Harper
I do not know whether my question will take us backwards, but I am thinking about what was said about the fact that we do not have numbers that accurately reflect the deer population. Duncan Orr-Ewing said that it was 10 deer per square kilometre, but that is the figure for red deer. Tom Turnbull mentioned the fact that we do not have accurate numbers, although we do, to an extent, in the Highlands. We measure what action is needed when there is deer damage and restoration is required. On top of that, there are all the different deer species. Does it matter whether we have accurate data if we measure the extent of the issue by looking at interventions that are based on damage or restoration requirements?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Emma Harper
Thanks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Emma Harper
Baseline data is going be collected and co-ordinated. I assume, therefore, that NatureScot will need to work with, say, Forestry and Land Scotland to ensure that everybody is aware of how the data is being collected and that it is being measured or analysed, or the level of damage assessed, to see whether a tipping point has been reached and a section 8 order is required. Am I correct in saying that partnership working will be required to collect that data?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Harper
I have another wee question on what you said about reporting. Do you think that it would be too much to require annual reporting when that data can already be pulled out?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning to the minister and Mr Wilson. I am interested in a couple of questions around the annual reporting and review requirements. Section 4 of the bill is entitled “Annual reports by Scottish Ministers”. I am interested to know what your views are on the responsibilities of ministers with regard to annual reporting on, and review of, the bill if it is enacted.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Emma Harper
If any changes are to be made to the data that is required under the reporting requirement, do you have thoughts on whether further regulations would be made through an affirmative instrument? Do you have any opinions about how changes to data gathering might need to be legislated for?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Emma Harper
Thanks, convener, and thank you for again giving me a wee bit of time to ask a couple of questions. Obviously, I am interested in both the A75 and the A77; I have asked questions in the chamber about them. I am really pleased to hear that so many people turned out for the village hall meeting at Crocketford—they will be happy that progress is being made.
I know that Belfast Harbour, P&O and Stena Line worked together on the “Safer, Greener, Better” document and looked at the facts and figures with regard to how the A75 and the A77 upgrades will benefit holidaymakers, hauliers and even commuters in relation to Cairnryan and Ireland. As we develop the two projects for Springholm and Crocketford, what are the next steps? Is there a hierarchy of or a priority for next projects—either the A75 or the A77, for example? Are teams continuously looking at what is next? I know Matt Halliday and I know Donald McHarrie really well, and I am sure that they will be happy to hear about current progress, but continuing to look to the future is part of that, too.