The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1153 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Thank you.
09:15Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
My question might relate more to the next theme, but I am interested in hearing your thoughts on the bill’s proposed age limit of 16, given that, in other legislation, the age limit is 18. That is clearly different.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning, minister. I am interested in the science of food additives and have been following the work of Professor Tim Spector, Chris van Tulleken and Carlos Monteiro in São Paulo in Brazil on the chemicals that are added to ultraprocessed foods.
I agree with the minister that the public trust Food Standards Scotland and the Food Standards Agency because of their work, which includes work on food crime. Yesterday, I met the head of food crime at Food Standards Scotland, and it was pretty eye watering to hear about all the work that is being done on that.
The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition looks at the evidence on new products that will potentially come on to the market, which will take up its time. Do you have enough assurance that that committee will keep you informed about all the products that are coming on to the market, especially as new evidence emerges, based on the work of Tim Spector and Chris van Tulleken?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
It has been interesting to hear everybody so far this morning. I remind everyone that I am still a registered nurse.
I am interested in some of the issues that have come up at committee about the process or model, including the ability of doctors to assess capacity and coercion without specialist input or training; the involvement of GPs, given the pressure on GP services; the level and experience of doctors; how the bill will prevent doctor shopping; and other issues to do with conscientious objection. I have a longer list, but I will save the time. Do the witnesses have any opinions about the process or service model as described in the bill? Do they include sufficient safeguards? Do they offer the prospect of a high-quality service?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Not all COPD is terminal, and not all diabetes is terminal.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
You mentioned feed. Food Standards Scotland looks not only at products that are for human consumption but at products for animals. We know that some products are added to the food of ruminants for emissions reduction. One of those products was mentioned in the chamber last week, because there seems to be a perception—perhaps because of fake news on the internet—that some products are not safe. However, they are rigorously tested before the products are even added to feed for our dairy cows, beef cattle or sheep.
I seek reassurance that my understanding is correct—that the products are rigorously tested and safe and that, therefore, people should not believe what they read on the internet.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Again, we are talking about autonomy and choice. Dialysis is not nice to go through. I have worked with patients who have had multiple issues. If someone is suffering, work should be done with their care provider, their clinician and their family to establish what autonomy they should be afforded.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
My understanding is that the UK bill refers to conditions that are untreatable, rather than ones that people cannot recover from, which is the language that the Scottish bill uses. Does that make a difference?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Some people can refuse treatment, but they might be treatable. For example, they could receive chemotherapy to extend their life for another six weeks, but they might say, “I don’t want to go through that.” I am trying to explore the difference in definition between untreatable and unrecoverable.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Emma Harper
Okay. I think that that is covered.