The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1910 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. The question is whether the environmental issues have been addressed. Will you expand on that? You have been talking about the numbers of inspections that you carry out and about SEPA’s obligations, but have the environmental standards improved with the expansion in the number of salmon fish farms that we have seen?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I see. So, that is different from what you are providing.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Do you measure yourself on the number of sites that you inspect, the level of compliance or the outcomes for the environment? Have the environmental issues been addressed?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
I am sorry, but it does not.
I note from your own information issues such as
“Discharge quality failures ... Seabed surveys failing licensing conditions ... Medicine/Chemical treatment causing sediment samples to exceed environmental quality standards”.
On top of that, there are “poor data returns” for various reasons, whether because of the withdrawal of veterinary advice, the weather or whatever. I am just trying to establish a picture here. I understand that you are looking at the process while I am looking at the environmental outcomes of SEPA’s actions, but, as far as I can see—unless you can prove to me that this is not the case—some of those areas have been left wanting.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
That is really useful. Thank you very much.
On the detail that you gave us on the number of announced and unannounced inspections that you carried out, you said that SEPA carried out three unannounced inspections of fish farms in 2023 and that you have three planned for this year. How many unannounced inspections did SEPA carry out for agricultural-based sites in 2023, and how are you working on enforcement capacity to ensure compliance?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
While you look for those figures, that leads me on nicely to the number of enforcement actions that have been taken. You said that, if satisfactory measures were not demonstrated and the situation was not satisfactory, that would lead you to issue an improvement notice and then escalate it to the procurator fiscal. What enforcement actions have been taken and have there been any prosecutions for failure to reduce sea lice levels?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Can you explain to the committee the practicalities of doing an inspection, asking individual salmon farms to put in satisfactory measures and then giving an improvement notice? That is all tied up with the next part of my question, which is about the no counts. Of course, a number of people are not reporting for various reasons.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Your approach sounds as though it is a little bit more carrot than stick. I would like the committee to understand the timeframe for going in, inspecting, saying that things need to improve and then being satisfied. How many times do you subsequently go back to an individual because the situation has not improved? You seem to be saying that there has been a breach at six farms but, looking at the raw data, there seems to be a more varied picture than that. There have been a number of breaches—more than you are describing—but they have not led to enforcement or referral to the procurator fiscal. Do you work out how long, on average, it takes for you to give somebody an opportunity to improve and to improve and to improve and to improve?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Okay. Maybe we will cover that later. I just want to know the average time, but I do not want to go into somebody else’s questions, convener. Can I ask about that?