The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1910 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Good morning, Dr Wells. First, is your organisation happy that SEPA is the lead agency?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
To be clear, how does describing the national status of a species differ from recognising that a species could become endangered?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Indeed: I was looking for examples of what you might have deemed positive or negative regarding that designation of responsibility.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
As a committee member, I find it very difficult to understand the interaction between the responsibilities of the fish health inspectorate, NatureScot, local authorities and the other bodies that make key decisions, which all seem to operate underneath the single regulatory body. I would like more clarity about how all those organisations interact, because it seems, at the moment, that certain organisations blame—if I can use such a strong word—others for certain areas that they do not have responsibility for. Is that a fair assessment?
10:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Going back to my question on the Scottish Government’s announcement on the commitment to doubling salmon production by 2030, what sort of impact has that had? Has it had a negative or positive impact on the relationship between the salmon farming sector and the wild fish sector?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
How are the statutory consultees weighted when an application is granted? You said that the process is about the salmon farm rather than about interaction with wild fish, so how does the weighting work for the risk assessment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
When WildFish gave evidence on 5 June, it said that it takes SEPA a long time to gather evidence of harm caused to wild salmon. The representative from WildFish said:
“SEPA estimates that it will take five years to collect that evidence. That is the opposite of precautionary.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 5 June 2024; c29.]
Is there a problem with the time that it takes to collect evidence of any harm caused by specific farms?
11:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
Among the various witnesses who have come before us, some organisations are not happy that SEPA has the capability to effectively regulate wild and farmed fish interactions. Although you are quite positive about the responsibility in relation to sea lice that SEPA has as the single lead body, are you concerned that it does not have the capability to regulate effectively?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 June 2024
Rachael Hamilton
How will the evidence be gathered if there is no transparency on SEPA’s website?