The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1594 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
Absolutely. Thank you.
Sarah Collins, you mentioned the view of the EIS Further Education Lecturers Association—or EIS-FELA—that the SFC has existing powers, but it does not use them. Are you talking primarily about the clawback of finances, or are there other powers that the SFC is currently not exercising, or not exercising sufficiently?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
If it is your position that, although it could have more powers, the SFC already has a sufficient level of power in this area that it is not using, am I paraphrasing the EIS correctly in saying that, from your perspective, there would be more benefit in putting more duties on the SFC to exercise these powers than giving it more powers without any duty to exercise them?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
Your submission makes an important point about the duty on the institutions to “have regard to” the SFC’s guidance perhaps not being strong enough, as they can just have regard to it without having to follow through on it, and there appears to be no clear recourse if that is what transpires.
Do you have any alternative proposals? How much further than having regard to the guidance would it be appropriate to go? Your ULA section, the EIS University Lecturers Association, makes the point that reclassification is certainly a balancing act for universities, while colleges have a bit more flexibility. How far would you like the bill to go with the duty on the institutions to do what the SFC tells them?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
Thank you very much.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
I apologise to the witnesses now, as I need to head off to another appointment before the end of the meeting.
I come to Vikki Manson first. You spoke about the absence of the word “employer” in the bill, which was interesting, and you highlighted the apprenticeship committee as a specific example of where the employer voice can be heard. That is useful—parliamentary committees are always keen for witnesses to make specific proposals for how a bill can be improved.
Do you have any other proposals for how we can make sure that the voice of employers, industry or business—however we are phrasing it—is heard? That could involve amendments to the bill, or changes that could be made as part of the transition process rather than in primary legislation, to ensure that the employer voice is mainstreamed through the system.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
When it comes to funding apprenticeships, do you have the power to claw money back or to disqualify a provider where there have been fair work issues—for example, where the apprentice has not been treated appropriately or where minimum wage levels have not been adhered to?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
It is quite reactive.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
Thanks very much.
Mary, you mentioned this a moment ago to Pam Duncan-Glancy, but the UCU submission contains proposals for more engagement at a national level between the SFC and unions on issues such as fair work. What outcomes are you looking for in that respect? You will forgive me, but one part of the system that I am less familiar with is the United Kingdom-wide collective bargaining aspects, and I am interested in how they would interact with a new national-level system, structure or framework in Scotland on issues such as fair work not just at an individual institution level but with the national funding body.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
Are you looking for those discussions to result in the SFC mandating that, for example, a reduction in casualisation or zero-hours contracts be part of the outcome agreement for a university’s funding?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Ross Greer
Could we legislate for anything to address the costs? Most of the time, cost issues are policy and operational matters, but they are still under our purview. Could we alter or amend anything in the bill to address some of those concerns?