The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1594 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Ross Greer
You did. I am asking you whether you think that it was worth the distress and upset that it caused. I presume, by accepting it, you believe that it was.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Ross Greer
I do not think that it would have made people feel more secure; I think that it would have avoided the loss of even more confidence that many staff feel in the senior management team overall. I acknowledge that it would not have solved the problem and that it would not have made staff feel any happier. My point is that your accepting the increase further damaged what little trust staff have in the senior management team. Those considerations need to be taken on board in the future on an on-going basis, but particularly at a point of what we all acknowledge is a financial crisis. That should be an active point of consideration for the senior management team in the future. However, I accept the answer that you have given.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Ross Greer
I acknowledge that. However, I go back to the assessment of your estate. Has your estates director been given a deadline for reporting to the executive team? Does the court have any indication of when a paper could be tabled for consideration?
10:45Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Ross Greer
I do not like interrupting but, to be clear, I understand entirely the process. I am familiar with remuneration committee processes. My question is to you, as somebody who accepted the increase. Do you think that it was worth the distress and the damage to staff morale for staff who face losing their jobs entirely and who, in most cases, are paid less than a 10th of what you are to see you getting a pay increase on an already incredibly substantial pay package, which puts you in the top 0.5 per cent of earners in Scotland? Was it worth it? That is what I am asking.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ross Greer
He is just intrigued.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ross Greer
That is fair enough. I would broadly agree with that. I think that Universities Scotland makes a fair point about simply wanting to understand what the Government is looking for.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ross Greer
If they have already taken voluntary packages, I will not pursue the matter further, but I echo your hope that we can find a way to retain the skills and knowledge that they have built up in the sector.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ross Greer
I know that last week’s Official Report has not been published yet.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ross Greer
Drafting instructions have already been requested on the matter.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Ross Greer
I appreciate that. To make broaden out my point—this overlaps somewhat with John Mason’s line of questioning about powers of compulsion in relation to information provision and the Dundee example—two quite different points of view have been put to us, not only in this evidence session but during the past couple of years.
The Educational Institute of Scotland has articulated the issue most clearly. It believes that the SFC has simply not exercised the powers that are already available to it to address poor governance and decision making in relation to not just financial viability but other matters, such as the erosion of fair work principles in particular, at institutions. The alternative position that the previous SFC chief executive articulated—I think that she said this when she last gave evidence to us before leaving the post—was that the SFC had insufficient powers of compulsion in relation to institutions.
The question that I have put to a lot of the witnesses whom we have spoken to so far has been about clawback. The SFC can claw back public money that has been provided to anyone that it funds. It is an incredibly blunt tool, and in many situations it would actually make things worse, particularly financial crises. As a result of the bill, would the SFC have sufficient powers to be able to exercise appropriate influence, and do you accept the point that clawback, although perhaps sometimes an effective stick to wield, will not be an effective means of enforcement or compulsion—however you want to word it—nine times out of 10?