The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 518 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
It is a brief supplementary, convener.
Minister, you say that you are willing to work with people on the issue. I will gently push you on that. On some of these issues, it is for the Government to show leadership and not to leave the matter to committees or to individuals to push it forward.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
There is a distinction. On some issues, you would expect to take soundings but, on others, the public would expect the Government to take a lead.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
Thank you, convener, and good morning, minister. The committee has heard from a range of stakeholders on the extension of candidacy rights to individuals with limited leave to remain. Although there is support in large part for the principle, there are concerns about the practical implications, and it has been suggested to the committee that individuals could qualify for candidacy only when their limited leave to remain would allow them to serve a full term. Would you consider that suggestion?
09:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
I understand that, but, if you dig into it, you see that such a situation could be controversial. If someone elected by the public had to leave the country part of the way through their term, that would lead to difficulties. Do you accept that the potential for such awkwardness exists, however unlikely it is to happen in practice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
Your organisation’s response to the committee’s call for views says that Missing People supports the broad conditions for the appointment of a judicial factor, as set out in section 3 of the bill, but that you have some practical concerns about the application of section 3 in a situation where a person is missing. For the benefit of the record, please say a little more about those concerns. Are you seeking to have those concerns resolved by having more information in the bill itself, or would it be sufficient for your purposes to have accompanying guidance for the legislation?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
I think that my question has largely been covered in that exchange, but how would a return be defined? Would, say, a brief encounter with a person or their getting back in touch bring the judicial factory to an end? After all, people sometimes make contact and then drift away again. How would you define a person being back in touch sufficiently to take over their own affairs?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
So, there is not a sufficient quantity of work that would stretch beyond the capacity that Fiona Brown or whoever was holding that role would have. That is effectively what you are saying.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
In response to the committee’s call for views, the Sheriffs and Summary Sheriffs Association said that it thought that the appointment of the accountant should be made not by the SCTS directly but by the Lord President. Do you have a view on that proposal?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
But you think that you have sufficient capacity to ensure that, as these changes come through, you will not require anyone else meeting this level of legal and accountancy qualification.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
On that point, are you envisaging that the people who are in the single figures would also be doing work for the Office of the Public Guardian and would not be specialising just in the—