The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 502 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
I am.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
Thank you. It is helpful to have that on the record. I am not asking you to come back on this, but I think that people do pawn things that they need, because they are desperate, so I think that there is a question around what is better, but you have been very clear that you think that this is the wrong approach.
I have some other quick questions on assignation. It came up in the first session and in some of the responses that we have had. How do you feel in relation to intimation? Does how the bill is currently set out cause you concern in terms of notification in particular?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
I understand that you heard bits of the previous panel’s evidence. We heard about the confusion that it causes people, such as people who are paying student rent, when they find out that the person to whom they owe money has changed. Is it a valid argument that finding out about the change can confuse people about who they have to pay and how to pay them?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
What would you recommend for section 13? Should it come out of the bill altogether?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
Obviously, I, too, am concerned about pawnbroking. I have seen in my own constituency work the situations that arise from it. However, we have heard from others—it is not necessarily their view, but it is an argument that is put forward, and I think that Mike Dailly also touched on it—that it is perhaps preferable to some other finance agreements that are available to people. From the Parliament’s point of view, I guess that the issue is how we might find a balance.
At the moment, people who use pawnbroking have to hand over the item. We heard that one of the potential benefits of the proposal is that they would not have to hand over their possession. To use Mike Dailly’s car example, someone could continue to drive their car or, in other instances, they could continue to use high-value items and would not have to give them to someone else. Would that be of benefit? My own view is that it would be quite hard to ask people to borrow against something that they could not live without.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
Thank you. I have a new line of questioning, convener.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
Yes—it relates to section 13(1).
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
Is it important, however, for people to know to whom, ultimately, they owe money, or is that just how business is done and it does not matter?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
Right, so you think that there are situations in which it is not important or not relevant?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Oliver Mundell
I do not want to interrupt you, but that already happens with pawnbroking; it is just that people have to give the asset away and they are not able to use it. Do you think that that is better?