The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 502 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
That is helpful. I was just trying to understand the position, because the memorandum talks about changing circumstances. Over that longer period, there have been lots of changing circumstances and, if the principles have generally remained constant, I would just like to understand the efficiency argument for changing them. However, that is more of a comment than a question.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
What would that look like, as a process? You mentioned having a statement of reasons. I am just trying to understand where that would fit in. Obviously, all secondary legislation that comes to the Parliament comes with an explanation from the Government, setting out the need for it at the time.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
Sorry to interrupt, but have you asked for any more information from the Government?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
So, on balance, you are not in support of the legislation as proposed.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
I will just put that issue to one side and ask you to step away from that position, because obviously we are focusing on the delegated powers in the bill. Do you think that, with the model that the Government has opted for, there is a problem with the specific delegated powers?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
I want to come back on your point about the number of independent law firms. I assume that the numbers that you gave relate to big whole-service law firms.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
I want to ask about the guarantee fund. Paragraph 6 of schedule 1 makes further provision about the guarantee fund. Commenting on the power, the Law Society noted:
“This has the potential for significant change to be made which may adversely impact ... the Fund”.
It also noted that there is
“no requirement for the Lord President’s consent”.
Will you elaborate further and give your view on the power and the consultation requirements that are associated with it?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
I want to ask about section 46(3), which allows Scottish ministers to make, by regulations, further provision to reconcile regulatory conflicts, with the requirement again to get the Lord President’s consent before doing so. I am aware that you have questioned the need for this subsection, too, but do you have any further comments on it?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Oliver Mundell
In which case, I will move on to ask about section 49, which I know has already been touched on, at least in passing. It provides that the Scottish ministers may establish by regulations a body with a view to it becoming a category 1 regulator and may specify
“circumstances under which the Scottish ministers may directly authorise and regulate legal businesses.”
The bill states that ministers must obtain the consent of the Lord President before making such regulations and, even then, make them only if they believe them to be necessary as a last resort.
Again, I am interested in your reflections on that delegated power and any other concerns that you have with it that have not already been stated. Do you consider that it is effectively hemmed in?