The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1492 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Jamie Greene
It is good that you mentioned that, because I am just about to come on to that issue.
I will take a step back and ask a more fundamental question about an issue that I have been grappling with throughout the session and when I read your report. What is your understanding of the point of the target? The target is to reduce the number of miles driven by domestic cars in Scotland. What is the point of that? What is the Government trying to achieve by reducing that figure?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us say that a million miles were driven by combustion engine cars and that was reduced by 20 per cent in the way that the target seems to suggest. It is assumed that that would reduce emissions. That assumption underpins the strategy. However, if we went in the other direction and 1.5 million miles were driven by electric or hybrid cars, instead of a million miles being driven by combustion engine cars, there might still be a reduction in emissions, even though the mileage that was driven by the public would have gone up.
I would have some sympathy if the Government simply dropped the target, provided that it did so for the right reason. If it was trying to reduce emissions and could demonstrate that other policies would achieve the same result, the target in itself would perhaps be irrelevant.
11:00Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Realistically, given that we are sitting here in the Parliament, I have to ask which Government in its right mind, particularly coming into an election year, would implement punitive measures such as national charging or road tolls, or start rolling out national measures—rather than doing things at a local level and blaming the councils—by introducing primary legislation that imposes expensive measures on drivers. Surely that would be political suicide for any Government in any jurisdiction. The measures might help to meet the target, but they are very unlikely to happen.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
The exit, for the record, cost the taxpayer £104,000. Is it normal for agencies that are sponsored by the Scottish Government to come to you after they have spent the money and ask, “Can you retrospectively approve this?”
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Is it malpractice?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Okay, so he resigned or he retired. What was the circumstance?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
And that was accepted and hence the presence of Mr Hinds. Okay; that is understood.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
I am sorry, I am not trying to be difficult; I am trying to get to the bottom of this. Someone has not been entirely truthful with the committee. Someone is not being entirely honest about what has happened: either the former chair of WICS, in his commentary to us about the approval process, or someone sitting in this room. I want to get to the bottom of it. I know that we have laboured this in the previous committee session, but it is important. Did someone from the Scottish Government give approval for the package? He says that that is what happened.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
There was; it was part of the conversation. He said that there was a phone call on 19 December—
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Mr Brannen, does this whole line of questioning not strike you as concerning? We have heard conflicting views from all the protagonists involved and the committee is as yet unable to establish the truth of the matter about this business case. There is an opinion from the board, there is an opinion from the individual who has since written to us about his departure, and there is an opinion from the cabinet secretary, Ms Màiri McAllan, who, in letters to the committee, expressed a view about who was at fault. On two occasions, this committee has heard from members of the Scottish Government about what they think happened.
Our poor clerks have to write a report on this, and I think that they will struggle to identify the truth of the matter. What is your view?