The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2120 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Were you involved in the telephone call between Donald MacRae, the former chair of WICS, and a number of Government officials, about which he claims that, in that call, approval was given for the severance? He also states that that was confirmed in a second phone call on 20 December, and that the words that were used were “You can do this”. Were you involved in that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Who was, then?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Did that person erroneously give approval for the business case?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
However, the individual did not face it. That is the problem.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us ask the new chair of the board. Mr Hinds, if you were sitting in the position that Mr MacRae was in at the time, would you have approved the resignation request or would you have preferred to go down a misconduct route?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
However, given everything that you said in your opening comments about the behaviour of the management at WICS—
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Is there perhaps a risk that Mr Sutherland has been used as an easy scapegoat for all the failings, given that he is no longer part of the organisation?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
That is a nice segue into colleagues’ questions about the future of the yard.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us talk about that. One of the major flags raised in the previous evidence session and in the report was the idea that all the eggs have been put in one basket, that being the small vessel replacement programme. The Auditor General said:
“if the yard was unsuccessful in securing work through the ... programme or if ... the shortfall was not backfilled by other ... avenues,”
there is doubt
“about the yard’s viability.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 16 January 2025; c 11.]
Other comments were made around that in writing and in the evidence from witnesses sitting where you are sitting. Do you accept that, in the creation of the business plan for the yard, too much emphasis or reliance was placed on winning that business? If that work does not follow through, does it leave a huge, gaping hole in your business plan?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Jamie Greene
Will that money be ring fenced? That is the question. Will capex investment in the yard be ring fenced?