The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1837 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
I draw your attention to paragraph 14 of the report, which I read with interest. We have spent a lot of time talking about the finances of the board, but it seems that that is not the only issue here. There are concerns about performance, services, quality and the existence of “significant operational pressures”. Could you talk us through the concerns that you identified, other than those to do with the financial problems at NHS Grampian?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
Thank you, Auditor General. How can a hospital run out of beds? Is it that suddenly and very quickly there is an unexpected wave of people who are very unwell or is it because of poor planning and forecasting capacity?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
Thank you. That is a very succinct analysis of the wider problem. Is the solution to the bed issue a new hospital or a new site? You state that there are physical issues in the estate, so the answer to that clearly is a new building, more beds and more people.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
The assurance board has a role to play in all this and will be there for the foreseeable future until things have turned around.
Is the improvement plan forthcoming? Where are we at with that? Has it been signed off? Has it been ratified? Are people happy with it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
I am trying to get my head around who is to blame here. NHS Ayrshire and Arran has been on level 3 for eight years, so there is financial intervention every single year. The idea that that is a loan is nonsense; I would put money on the fact that it is never going to pay this stuff back. The model is broken, in my view. Something is clearly going wrong, but I cannot quite work out who is to blame. Is it governance issues? Is it the board? Is it the management team? Is it the Government? Is it ministers? Is it all of the above?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
Can we cut to the chase? Are we just dancing around the issue that the current model is not working? The unsustainability that you highlight in your audit is a long-term issue; it is not a one-off. It has been happening for nearly a decade, and it is probably going to continue in the same direction, if not get worse.
The idea is that the Government is somehow helping out by stepping in and plugging financial holes, painting the picture of it saving the board. Do you think that the Government needs to have a fundamental look at the entire model to rephrase it, reframe it and be a bit more honest with the public and the health board about how it is funded and what it expects of the board?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
I have one final question. The idea of brokerage is political lingo, but is there a reason why the Government frames it in that way? Essentially, it is saying to boards that, if they are spending more than they have, the Government will make up the difference in the form of a loan. Are there financial or audit reasons why it would do that? Is someone sitting in a civil service room saying, “Minister, do not just give them cash—give them loans”, because it has a financial benefit or some knock-on effect down the line or in the way that the Government reports its accounting?
If we multiply the approach across all boards, it is a substantial sum of cash. Why would ministers not simply say, “Look, if you need £30 million to meet your health objectives, we will give you that”, rather than continue a pretence that the money is a loan? It is never going to be paid back.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
It is not really a loan; there is no expectation that it will be paid back.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
Is any of that a surprise to anyone? We know that there is an ageing population, particularly in this health board area. Demographic analysis has been done—using data, presumably. It would not have been a new problem, but would have been known to the board and, indeed, to ministers for some time.
The idea that it is a surprise that lots of people who are elderly and unwell might present at A and E—setting aside the issue of Covid or an unexpected health issue, which clearly people were not prepared for—seems surprising; I am surprised that this is a surprise to people.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Greene
That leads nicely into what the solution is. Is it just throwing more cash at the problem? Is it the end-to-end fixing of all the problems that response times for A and E, bed-blocking and delayed discharge present? Do we need more staff? How do we solve these issues? You can either write cheques endlessly to health boards or have a systemic root-and-branch review of the entire journey from being ill to getting home again.