The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1492 contributions
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
Sorry to interrupt, but when you answer, I would really like to hear why you have chosen not to go down the fee increase route.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
Good morning. You will be relieved to hear that I will ask my questions in two tranches and I will come back in later with the second tranche.
The first area that I will cover is basically about people. At the end of the day, audit work is about people, as much as we talk about automation and software. Let us look at some of your numbers. On page 12 of your budget proposal, you summarise the position on costs and you propose that your people costs will be £25.8 million for 2025-26. To give me an idea of how you perform against budget expectations, can you let me know what the result of last year’s budget is likely to be for people costs? What I am looking for is what you thought you would spend on people in 2024-25 versus what you expect to spend, just to give me an idea of how on track you are with the budget.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
When was the £24.6 million adjusted? How does it match up with what you forecast at the beginning of the financial year that you would spend on people?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
In your opening statement, Auditor General, you said that you audit 300 public bodies. Half a million pounds spread across hundreds of bodies would not be a huge cost increase for them, would it? Is that not a fairer approach? Ultimately, it is a pass-on cost. Again, there is a slight domino effect to all of this, and we do not really know where all those things will land in the next couple of months. However, it is not as if you are turning up at a public authority and asking for hundreds of thousands of pounds per authority, for example.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
I guess that it is important not to look at the project through the prism of a single-year ask. Even though we are talking about just the first year of that three-year spend and the money is being spread out, you are essentially asking for sign-off of the whole project. We have spoken a lot about how much the project will cost and how much you need to do it, but we have not heard a huge amount about what comes out the other end. What are the savings involved? We probably do not have time to go into all that today, so I will park that there.
I would like to see a breakdown of the overall cost, particularly the £670,000 for this year, to understand the terminology of “resource” versus “capital” and so on. In providing that, you could perhaps paint a rosier picture of why spending £2 million on modernisation will save money down the line.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
I had been saving up this question for when we came on to the fees issue, but I note that a third of your auditing is undertaken by external firms. I appreciate that you have a multiyear deal with them and that you are obliged to increase their fees to you—by 4 per cent this year, if I am not mistaken.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
That is interesting, bearing in mind what we are looking at for next year and your asks there. I presume that the increase includes year 2 of the pay deal that was agreed, which involves an increase of 3.8 per cent. However, does it include or exclude the national insurance contribution increases? I presume that they were not factored into your initial projections for 2025-26.
11:45Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
You have come to the table asking for a 10 per cent increase overall, which is substantial. I am trying to break it down into the constituent parts to make it easier to scrutinise. A big chunk of that is the national insurance contribution. I am trying to find out why Audit Scotland felt that this was the mechanism to try to recuperate that money.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
Something else that struck me about that table on page 12 is the staff projections. Please do not take this in any way as a criticism, but it jumped out at me. For the years 2024-25, 2025-26, 2026-27 and 2027-28, you have projected pretty much the same number of staff. It is very unusual in an organisation to have such certainty, year on year. In addition—maybe this is a question for the board—does having the same numbers of people scream of efficiency and productivity improvements? Do you suspect that the volume of work will be the same? Will you need more people to do more work, because of the change in working hours? I am trying to get my head around this, because it strikes me as such an unusual forecast in a big organisation.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Jamie Greene
In essence, you are saying that your current cost estimate for the modernisation project is about £2.2 million—that is a back of a fag packet analysis—and you are splitting that over three financial years, with the first tranche being an ask of £672,000 for next year and an expectation of £1.5 million over the following two years’ budgets. Is that correct?