The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1821 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
I am glad that you mentioned that. I received your manifesto asks the other day. It is interesting. You say that it is difficult to quantify how short councils are in terms of their ability to deliver the Promise, but we have specific asks from COSLA, and it is not a small amount of cash that is being sought—it is a £16 billion inflationary uplift to, I presume, the block grant funding. There is £750 million for social care, which COSLA claims would increase the social worker workforce by more than 19,000—I will come on to the workforce in a moment; £844 million for the capital grant; and another nearly £1 billion for affordable housing supply, which may address some of the housing issues.
Mr Rennick, I imagine that you do not have £16 billion sloshing around your coffers at the moment. However, do you see the point? If local councils are not properly funded, there is no way on earth that we will deliver the Promise by 2030.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Let us talk about the whole family wellbeing fund. How much of the £0.5 billion that was promised has been spent?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
I would have preferred that you came in and said, “Look, there is stuff in this report we do not like, so I cannot sign up to the report and its recommendations.” If you had been honest with us from the minute that you walked in the door, we would not be having this conversation. I will finish where I started in my supplementary questions—there is nothing wrong with disagreeing with the Auditor General, but be honest about it. That is all we ask for.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
That is helpful feedback. Mr Rennick, will you give Mr Anderson more than 15 minutes of your time? This is an extremely important matter.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
It is a good example of that. However, David gave a really good example of the oversight group going to ministers and civil servants at the most senior level and saying, “We have a problem here as this policy has been paused”—and nothing happened. That is not the local authority’s fault.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
I will move on to COSLA.
We received a letter from COSLA just two days ago, ahead of the session. I appreciate that you did not write the letter but it has your logo on it, so I will ask you about it. It is from Councillor Buchanan, who is your children and young people spokesperson. He made the valid point that local authorities make annual budget decisions within the confines of the funding arrangements that they work to. However, he then went on to say that
“COSLA cannot comment on gaps within each of our 32 councils.”
That leads me to ask what the point of COSLA is in this area. You have a commitment to keep the Promise, but you can talk only about the generality of what local authorities do and are clearly unwilling to criticise individual councils. The impression that I get is that, if there are specific failures in specific parts of Scotland, which we know there are, COSLA seems quite unwilling or reticent to unearth those local failings. Ultimately, it is local delivery that will meet local needs, is it not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Thank you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Good morning—it is just about still morning.
Mr Watson, you have just answered my question on AST, so there is not much to add. What happened at AST is clear. It had a future in a market that is booming and growing in Scotland and across the world. It should have been supported by as many parts of the public sector as possible but, due to its structural arrangements, it was simply unable to stay solvent. That is my summary.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Jamie Greene
So, in your view, not signing off the accounts was the right and proper thing to do.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Thank you. Living quarter to quarter financially is not great for any organisation. You have staff wages to pay. I have spoken with some of the college tutors at Perth and they admit that they did not always realise the bigger picture of college finances, how perilous they were and that their salaries might not go into their bank accounts that month. I guess that you do not want to advertise on the walls of the college that you are running out of cash this month.
I want to talk about some of the mitigating measures that you took to make ends meet. If at any point you were running out of cash, how were you able to make ends meet? Were you given loan funding? Was there bridging funding from the SFC? Were you simply taking money out of future pots of cash to suck into this quarter from the next? I could not quite understand how you were able to pay the bills.