The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1914 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
Many thanks, Auditor General. We have a wide range of questions, so we will get straight into them.
I will kick off—perhaps I am abusing my new position of power. I am quite intrigued by your opening comments. You used a number of phrases and a lot of terminology that, unfortunately, the committee has heard before in section 22 reports, on governance instability and unacceptable levels of governance in a public body. Based on your understanding, what is the root cause of this period of instability at Historic Environment Scotland? How did it get itself into such a situation at the time of your audit?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
Thank you very much for that further update. Members have questions on many of the areas that you have identified in your report, so we will come back to you on them.
Auditor General, to go back to your summation of how HES got itself into this mess in the first place, do you understand it to be twofold in nature? There are internal problems with staff turnover and leadership at the very top of the organisation but, in parallel, there is a lack of oversight from the Scottish Government, given that HES is a public body. To put that in context, Historic Environment Scotland, which employs more than 1,600 members of permanent staff and has a turnover of £140 million in just one year, is also in receipt of significant amounts of public money by way of grant funding—around £70 million in the year that the auditors identified.
The importance of the role of the body and what it does on a day-to-day basis has surely been somewhat compromised by the instability and lack of leadership. Perhaps that has led to some issues of trust in the body from the public and those it assists on a day-to-day basis.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
You may not know the answer, but is Audit Scotland aware of any other public bodies that are currently in amber or red on the RAG status list, in terms of their sponsorship?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
Those are questions that we might rightly wish to ask of the Scottish Government in response to your comments. I will bring in a colleague in a second. Has Audit Scotland had any conversations with the chair or any members of the board of the agency? Presumably, the role of the board is to provide oversight of the governance arrangements, but it sounds as though there was a distinct lack of that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
Thank you for that further information. Mr Simpson has a supplementary question on this theme.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
I will pass over to Mr Beattie.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
My point is that that occurred in the absence of an accountable officer or any senior leadership in HES.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
If you are willing to do that, that would be helpful. Thank you, Auditor General.
On that note, I conclude the evidence-taking session. I thank Stephen Boyle, the Auditor General, and his accompanying officials—Lisa Duthie, audit director, and Carole Grant, audit director—for answering the committee’s questions on the section 22 report into HES so comprehensively. The committee will consider its next steps in due course.
I suspend the meeting until 11 o’clock to allow for a change of witnesses and a short comfort break.
10:53
Meeting suspended.
11:00
On resuming—
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
Welcome back to the Public Audit Committee. Item 3 is consideration of our inquiry into the Cairngorm funicular railway. I extend a warm welcome to our three witnesses this morning. Nick Kempe is a campaigner and mountaineer, Gordon Bulloch is a former environmental land remediation and business turnaround manager, and Dave Morris is a Cairn Gorm and international mountain expert. All three gentlemen are members of Parkswatch Scotland. Correct me if I have any of that wrong.
Before we get into questions from committee members, I invite Nick Kempe to make a short opening statement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jamie Greene
You do not need to press your button. Just let the technician do that for you.