The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1837 contributions
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Okay. While I have you on the phone, can I ask you about attrition or turnover at Audit Scotland in the past year compared with previous years? What is your current rate?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Are you training graduates?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Good.
We do not have a huge amount of time, so I am going to ask about the future and about your modernisation project, which is a subject that I know you were expecting would come up today. We have looked a little at your finances, and Mr Oliver talked about the re-profiling of some of the money that you thought you were going to spend this year but now want to move forward.
I want to get this correct. There is £430,000 that you expected to spend in this financial year but are not going to spend, so you have offered to return that to the consolidated fund. However, you are essentially asking to have that looped back to you. Would there be any benefit for you in being able to hold on to money and carry it over, rather than having to do a complicated dance of kindly giving money back to us and then coming begging for it the next day? Could we do that better?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Just for clarification, is the £250,000 NFI money in addition to your revenue ask of us? Are you asking for a one-off payment for that?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Jamie Greene
We would need to identify the potential risk of that mid-year revision before we think about the overall annual settlement. It would be helpful if you had some insight, because it is a simple replication of this year’s numbers—I am always quite suspicious of forecasts that are identical to this year’s actual spend.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Jamie Greene
I was going to flag that. I recall having this conversation last year, and the increase in what was classed as income of £1.7 million in effect became a deficit to you, and that money had to be recouped through the SCF. My concern is that next year’s costs simply replicate this year’s costs. However, you have not received your statement yet. What happens if that says that that has reduced in value by £2 million? Suddenly, your £15.8 million ask will become £17.8 million. There is a huge unknown with that. I appreciate that it is out of your control, but that was a huge part of why we had to give you so much extra money last year.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
You say that progress has been made. Since the Promise was first made, a third of councils in Scotland have declared a housing emergency. Our briefings from COSLA and Shelter Scotland state that nearly 17,000 children are homeless in Scotland and more than 10,000 are in temporary accommodation. Does that sound like we are keeping the Promise for those 17,000 children? It does not sound like it to me.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
I appreciate that time is ticking on, so I will try to make my last two questions brief. Workforce is an important issue that is covered in the report. Exhibit 8 provides us with a nice visual way of understanding the scale of the problem that we have at the moment. To pick a few examples, 13 per cent of social workers who were asked were very likely to leave their jobs in the next 12 months—I presume that that is a fairly high figure—half of foster carers have considered resigning, half experience burnout and poor wellbeing and some 40 per cent of children and young people social care staff do not feel safe at work. Those startling statistics paint a worrying picture of the workforce required to deliver the Promise, do they not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Most of the ground has been covered by those with far more in-depth knowledge of the subject than I have, but one thing that has struck me throughout this evidence-taking session—and indeed in other similar sessions, particularly on NHS boards—is that these are not new issues. These matters that have been raised by Audit Scotland with previous iterations of this committee as well as with this committee and, no doubt, will be raised with future public audit committees.
However, we are not talking about financial auditing here—people are involved. Indeed, the convener opened the session by pointing out that people are suffering, and sometimes self-harming, as a result of inaction. At what point, Auditor General, does what I can only assume is your frustration at the lack of progress turn into something more statutory? After all, we cannot keep producing section 22 reports year after year after year that say the same thing and still see no adequate progress by, or accountability from, these public bodies. What more can we as a Parliament or as a committee do? Indeed, what more can you, with your statutory abilities, do?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Greene
My final question is simply this. We are now five years on from the Promise being made. There is clearly an ambition and a lot of good will in the room among stakeholders to meet the Promise, but in your professional judgment are we on track to do so by 2030? I am happy to go along the panel to hear answers.