Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 20 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1245 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services Inquiry

Meeting date: 1 November 2022

Liam Kerr

What about Western Ferries?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 1 November 2022

Liam Kerr

I understand that answer. Incidentally, I am not quite clear whether the £2.4 million is for publicity and awareness raising as well as for the process. One would have thought that the Scottish Government would be able to project the cost that is associated with the publication of proposals, consultation, the handling of representations, appointing a reporter and a process to hold a hearing. It should be able to come up with at least a ballpark figure for that. Local authorities should also be able to say that, when the measures come in, what the costs would roughly be if they had to run a full process. Am I missing something, minister?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Regulation

Meeting date: 25 October 2022

Liam Kerr

If only 10 per cent of overflows are monitored, and given that overflows have increased by 70 per cent since 2017, to about 563,000 hours, does that suggest that the problem of sewage overflows is actually far worse than the data currently suggests?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Regulation

Meeting date: 25 October 2022

Liam Kerr

I will stick to the same topic in my question to John Kerr. In October, The Courier reported that raw sewage had been pumped into Loch Leven. At the time, NatureScot called that a “serious pollution incident”. The report asked the minister for a response, but she appears to have declined. A spokesman talked about historical investment and some general on-going investment. Given that incident, and the statistics that I just put to Jo Green, is it NatureScot’s view that the issue is not being taken seriously enough? Do you think that anything will change?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Standards Scotland

Meeting date: 25 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Regulation

Meeting date: 25 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Forgive me for interrupting. My question might not have translated well. I asked specifically about the 10 per cent of sewage overflows that are monitored, which is markedly less than the proportion being monitored in England. Why is there that disparity? Why are we monitoring only 10 per cent of overflows? Is it your view that we should be monitoring many more?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Regulation

Meeting date: 25 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Very good. Is there an issue with basing those reviews only on publicly available data, given, for example, the lack of sewage overflow data, which we examined earlier?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Regulation

Meeting date: 25 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Good morning. I want to change the topic to water quality and sewage overflows. Jo Green, only 10 per cent of sewage overflows are monitored in Scotland, whereas 80 per cent are monitored in England. Why is there that disparity? Should that be changed?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Standards Scotland

Meeting date: 25 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Good morning to the panel. ESS issued its air quality report towards the end of last month, as Neil Langhorn and Jim Martin mentioned. Your investigation found evidence of

“a continued failure in some areas of Scotland”

to meet legal limits for nitrogen dioxide, and

“weaknesses in ... current operational and governance arrangements”.

The report made six recommendations. Neil Langhorn mentioned that an improvement plan needs to be prepared. My understanding is that that is a requirement under the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Continuity) (Scotland) Act 2021. To go back to Monica Lennon’s line of questioning, what actual power do you as an organisation have to enforce the recommendations and to demand from the Government timelines for compliance?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Standards Scotland

Meeting date: 25 October 2022

Liam Kerr

So the improvement plan must come back to the Parliament. I have read the report’s key findings and, in my subjective view, they were pretty damning. For example, they suggest that the Scottish Government is not using powers that are available to it and that the overall governance frameworks are complex. Before the improvement plan is prepared—one can anticipate that that will take time—is there any requirement on the Scottish Government to respond to your report?