The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1100 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I would be grateful if you would do so, because you have said in your submission that you “seek assurance” and it will help the committee to understand exactly what you mean by that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I am grateful. You are right. In your written submission, you say that you
“seek assurance that communication for victims whose cases are settled with a fiscal fine will be a priority.”
Can you help the committee understand what the current situation is? What happens at the moment and what do you want to change?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I will stick with the issue of virtual attendance, with a first question for Stuart Munro on that point. In your response to the convener, you set out the things that should be thought through when creating policy, but this is not a policy; it is a bill. Given the concerns that you have highlighted, what amendments to this particular area of the bill—section 2—should the committee consider in order to address those concerns? Or should that be done outside the legislative process?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
You raise the point that you are a practising solicitor. As Ben Macpherson declared his interest earlier, I remind the committee that I am a practising solicitor, although I do not practise criminal law and have not done so for 20 years.
Paul Smith, let us stick with the issue of virtual attendance. The Edinburgh Bar Association tells us, in its submission, that it does not support virtual attendance at the custody court.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
You earlier set out some practical issues—for example, the cost. You said that it would need millions of pounds. You also highlighted concerns about the need for effective communication between the person who is held in custody and the defence lawyer. Would you elaborate on that for the committee? Are there specific amendments to the bill that the committee needs to consider to address those concerns?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
Out of interest, Stuart, on whom does the onus lie to make the changes to which you have just referred? Who could change the system?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Liam Kerr
Simon Brown, I want to take you back to something that you said earlier, just to ensure that we air this point. You talked about the need for legal aid provision for solicitors when they are dealing with virtual attendance. We already know that, in a context in which there is a significant decline in such solicitors doing legal aid work, many will feel that the provision is less than ideal already. Can you help the committee to understand what legal aid is currently available, if it is available at all for virtual attendance, and what the issues are around legal aid in general?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I would like to press you on the costings. Page 16 of your report details the finances, which are considerable and have increased by £500,000 in the past year. Staffing costs, which are clearly required based on what you have just said, make up 84 per cent of your spend. Can you tell the committee more about that?
I hear what you say about the financial memorandum and the difficulties of accurately making projections, but MSPs will have to consider such issues. What is the financial impact of the bill on the PIRC? The Scottish Government has had difficulty in making accurate projections in financial memoranda, so have the extra costs been sufficiently accounted for to give you comfort, particularly given Phil Chapman’s comments about the changes to corroboration?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand and am grateful.