The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1090 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Liam Kerr
I will press you on that. The Parliament sometimes passes bills, saying that that is what we want the law to be, but then there is a significant delay between that point and the commencement of the provisions. The committee might be worried that, if the Parliament passes the bill and says that it wants the reviews to be carried out, and if the provisions do not commence for a significant time, there could be a large window in which incidents are happening but not being reviewed. Is that a concern?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Liam Kerr
Practical solutions require resources, of course. On a related note, we have heard the provisions being described as “enabling”, such that they allow for certain developments but do not require them. The financial memorandum does not seem to provide figures for the costs of expanding any virtual attendance. Is there a risk that what is enabled is not progressed because there are not any associated resources?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning, cabinet secretary. The committee heard—or it has been suggested to us—that, by not sticking to the definitions in the 2018 act, there was a risk of undermining the current understanding of domestic abuse. Is that a risk, or is that not going to be a problem?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand—thank you.
Dr Fletcher, I have a similar question. Does the financial memorandum take sufficient account of the costs to the NHS of supporting the reviews and implementing any recommendations?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Liam Kerr
Thank you. Graeme Simpson, feel free to answer the finance point in your response, but I also want to ask you about the Social Work Scotland submission, which suggests that there has been a lack of “consultation with key stakeholders” in developing the model. Is a lack of consultation widespread across many key organisations? Do you have a view on what might have been different in the model had consultation taken place?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. Dr Scott, you have just raised some concerns, but I am not sure that I heard you talk about the finances. As you will know well, the committee has been concerned about laws being brought in without sufficient backing to implement or deliver on admirable intentions. You say, rightly, that your organisations are the experts. It has been suggested that, due to a lack of funding, some organisations that are involved in preventing domestic abuse might struggle to support the reviews or to implement any recommendations that are being brought in by the bill. Do you share that concern, and do you have a view on the finances that are allocated to the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful.
Fiona Drouet, I ask you the same question about finances.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Liam Kerr
Dr Scott, Rona Mackay asked you about the definitions in section 9. Let us assume that we do not import the definitions from the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018. In your written submission, you expressed concern about the definitions of “child” and “young person” that are used in the bill. For the record, will you articulate your concern and what you would like the committee to do in relation to those definitions?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Liam Kerr
You have both made powerful points.
Dr Scott, you said earlier that the process so far has been pretty good. However, given the concerns that both witnesses have just raised about the finances, has your organisation had an opportunity to raise directly with the Government those financial concerns, as well as any other concerns about the timescales for implementing the legislation?