The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1276 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Yes, of course.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
On the contrary. With respect, cabinet secretary, the problem is that the Government has done nothing, because this is not a new situation. As I said to Rona Mackay, this has been in train for so long that there have been previous early release programmes. Were I in Government, I would have immediately accelerated. I would not have allowed the cost overruns and the time overruns on HMP Glasgow and HMP Highland to go ahead. For example, one of the other things—
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Thank you, cabinet secretary, for taking part in this morning’s evidence session. I will oppose the draft SSI, and I believe that the committee should vote against the motion.
I will set out my reasons for taking that position. It is clear that Victim Support Scotland is right in saying that the measure is no solution. We will be in this situation next April, following the release of a further 1,000 prisoners. The knee-jerk response has now become the default response, and I can see no real progress since the previous early releases to prevent that repeatedly happening.
I note that the cabinet secretary did not expressly rule out long-term prisoner release. Her comments were helpful but she did not rule it out. The argument around a knee-jerk release of short-term prisoners becoming the default response, without ruling out long-term prisoners, suggests that the measure could be the thin end of the wedge. I do not see enough evidence of other options being considered.
I noted the remarks made the other day, when the SPS said that a new prison the size of HMP Grampian or HMP Shotts is required to relieve the overcrowding, but the cabinet secretary suggested that there will not be any further new builds because, to use her words, if we build it, they will come. With respect, I do not find that to be a coherent argument, given that, for example, His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland suggests that early release does not
“address any of the root causes”
of the problems. It is not the building of prisons that raises or lowers the prison population; it is other issues in the justice system.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Forgive me for interrupting, but I am conscious that I am monopolising the floor here. Given the context that you have set out, what happens if the bill criminalises the buyer?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Dr Sandy, I think that you would take a similar view of the Nordic model. Do you have any evidence to add to that from Dr Vuolajärvi?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
What is your evidence?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Dr Sandy, forgive me for interrupting, but the question that I need evidence on is less about decriminalisation and specifically about criminalisation of the buyer. What is the evidence on the impact there?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful. Ruth Breslin, you take a different view of the Nordic model—the criminalisation of the buyer. We have just heard evidence that tends to a view that criminalisation of the buyer will not achieve the ends of the bill. You would take a different view.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
It was all very helpful. I am very grateful to you all.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Following on from the point that you have just made, my final question is about long-term prisoners. Yesterday in the chamber, members asked about long-term prisoners, and I was not entirely clear about the response, so I will put the question to you again. You have not ruled out the early release of long-term prisoners—although, for clarity, I understand that that is not being considered as part of the Early Release of Prisoners (Scotland) Regulations 2025. How likely is it that the early release of long-term prisoners will happen? Given the greater danger that, logically, that step would pose to the public and to victims, what enhanced victim notification are you considering were such a move to happen? What analysis is the Government doing of any greater public risk posed by such a move?