The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1100 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
Forgive me for cutting across you, but I am sure that those issues will come out during the evidence session. I asked whether the SQA specifically accepts in their entirety the criticisms that were levelled.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
We all respect the views, but I put it to you that that suggests that you disagree with some of the criticisms.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
I will be asking you a direct question about that in two seconds, so I will just hold things there, if you do not mind.
How much involvement did you and the SQA have in drafting the bill, such that it is actually something that the SQA has worked on, given the criticisms that were made? After all, you will have the knowledge. Have you had input into the bill, or is it being drafted and imposed by the Government?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
My final question is for Stuart Hunter. You heard quite a lot there about cultural change and the restoration of trust. Do you in the SSTA think that the fix to that is legislative, or is it practical and on the ground? In any event, given what you have heard, what should we as a committee amend? What change to the bill would you like?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
Good morning. I will direct a question straight to Fiona Robertson. Concerns have been raised about the same actors being in the old and the new bodies, before and after reform. Several reports have highlighted that there were various fundamental issues with the SQA that required reform. Do you and, presumably, the management of the SQA accept all those characterisations and issues in their entirety, or are there any that went too far or were unfair?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
If the Government does not provide that money, will you not realise the ambitions?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
I have a quick question for Fiona Robertson. In your letter to the committee, you say that investment is needed, and you give a specific example. How much investment is needed? What figure are you after? Is there any indication that that investment will be forthcoming?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
You are having a grand day.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Liam Kerr
I thank everyone for their submissions, which I will refer to, but I will come to you first, Graham Hutton. In the SLS submission, you say that reform is overdue, and you speak quite positively about some of the things that are happening. Earlier, we explored the fact that, fundamentally, the same people from the SQA will be popping up on the other side of reform. Does SLS have any sense that the SQA and the people who run it accept the criticisms that have been levelled in their entirety? In any event, are those who are presiding over those issues able and willing to address those criticisms as we go forward?