The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1262 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Dr Sandy, I think that you would take a similar view of the Nordic model. Do you have any evidence to add to that from Dr Vuolajärvi?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
What is your evidence?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Dr Sandy, forgive me for interrupting, but the question that I need evidence on is less about decriminalisation and specifically about criminalisation of the buyer. What is the evidence on the impact there?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful. Ruth Breslin, you take a different view of the Nordic model—the criminalisation of the buyer. We have just heard evidence that tends to a view that criminalisation of the buyer will not achieve the ends of the bill. You would take a different view.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
It was all very helpful. I am very grateful to you all.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Following on from the point that you have just made, my final question is about long-term prisoners. Yesterday in the chamber, members asked about long-term prisoners, and I was not entirely clear about the response, so I will put the question to you again. You have not ruled out the early release of long-term prisoners—although, for clarity, I understand that that is not being considered as part of the Early Release of Prisoners (Scotland) Regulations 2025. How likely is it that the early release of long-term prisoners will happen? Given the greater danger that, logically, that step would pose to the public and to victims, what enhanced victim notification are you considering were such a move to happen? What analysis is the Government doing of any greater public risk posed by such a move?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Liam Kerr
No. With respect, cabinet secretary, let me answer the question. HMP Kilmarnock was taken back into the public sector. By all means, cabinet secretary, correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that part of Serco’s offer was to open a new wing as part of HMP Kilmarnock, thus increasing capacity and potentially solving the overcrowding issue. The fact that HMP Kilmarnock was taken back into the public sector for what some might suggest are ideological reasons might have ruined that possibility.
Cabinet secretary, this is an ill-thought-through and risky response to a situation that we knew and have known for a long time would occur. I will not be voting for it, and I do not think that the committee should, either.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. I will direct my questions precisely, but catch my eye if you want to come in. I will come to Diane Martin first. The committee has received evidence that states that the criminalisation of those who buy sex would put sex workers at greater risk of violence and would not reduce demand for prostitution or reduce trafficking. Do you take a different view? If so, why?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Yes, convener. I am very grateful to all the witnesses.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning. Niki Adams, I will come straight back to you. The committee has your evidence that the criminalisation of those who buy sex puts sex workers at greater risk of violence and does not reduce demand for prostitution or reduce trafficking. Panel 1 took a different view and talked about France, specifically, as an exemplar. Your evidence speaks to specific research in France that has a very different, negative take. Can you help the committee understand why there is a discrepancy on that point? Why is one panel of witnesses telling us that France is an exemplar, while you seem to be saying that it is not, and you conclude that criminalisation will not work?