The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1100 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Liam Kerr
I want to ask about the victim contact team, which was announced in early October. You said that amendments on that will be lodged at stage 2. One issue with bills that go through this Parliament, which is often slightly less than desirable, and is something that has been raised by this committee and others, is the costs that get loaded on to agencies and how they are calculated. Before the committee considers the amendments on the victim contact team, can you tell us how much the team will cost to set up, and what its on-going cost will be?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Liam Kerr
I have a brief follow-up, minister. Concerns have been raised that dealing with reform in this way—in other words, through amendments that put in something completely new at stage 2—is less than satisfactory. Arguably, it precludes proper consultation and scrutiny, not least because, as we have heard today, you have no idea of the costs and format of the victim contact team, and you have also talked about not being sure about getting the data sharing through. Do you have a view on whether this is an appropriate way of making legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Liam Kerr
Indeed.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
Good morning. I remind the committee, witnesses and anyone who is watching of my interests, in that I am a practising solicitor and I am regulated by the Law Society of Scotland.
At stage 1, the cabinet secretary told the committee—these are my words—that the system needs to be considered holistically, such that, if you remove the not proven verdict, you need to do something with the jury size, for example. That view was reflected in Stuart Munro’s opening remarks.
Now, of course, the cabinet secretary is winding back on jury size but increasing the majority that is needed for a conviction. Michael Meehan, in the faculty’s view, does adding two to the majority provide sufficient safeguards in light of the removal of the verdict? Is there any evidence to suggest that a two-thirds majority is appropriate in a two-verdict system?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
I am very grateful.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
For the avoidance of doubt, is there any way that 10 out of 15 could be considered a supermajority?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
Yes. With regard to section 63, on anonymity for victims, the committee raised a couple of issues around the public domain defence and the application of a definition of “victim”. The cabinet secretary’s letter suggests various amendments to address those points. Will they be sufficient, or could they have gone further?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
To be clear, though, you would prefer it if the cabinet secretary’s amendments were to go further, particularly with regard to anonymity after death. Is that right?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
I will be brief. I have a question on section 40—I will put it to Michael Meehan, but the other two gentlemen can come in if they wish.
Section 40 concerns the appointment and tenure of judges, and section 40(7) to 40(9) concerns the removal of judges. That can currently be done without reasons being given. The committee raised concerns about the proposed changes in that regard at stage 1. In your view, is there a concern that the threat of removal without reasons could risk impacting the independence of decision making?
In any event, given that the cabinet secretary has signalled a willingness to lodge amendments to the removal process, what would those amendments need to look like, in your view, to ameliorate any risk?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Liam Kerr
I understand—thank you.