The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 942 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Colin Smyth
I agree, minister, that we need to move at pace, but the Acorn project has been under development for more than a decade, and I am sure that you appreciate that there is considerable frustration among potential developers.
Will you tell us why there has been what appears to be such a lack of progress in supporting that project? Also, to go back to my first question, will we get a clear announcement in the summer on whether the UK Government supports taking forward the Acorn project?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Colin Smyth
Do you have a target for the proportion from Scotland of those supply chain jobs?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Colin Smyth
I will give the officials more time to scribble, if you wish, minister. Do you accept that, without the Acorn project, we will not decarbonise Grangemouth and we will not have a just transition in that area?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Colin Smyth
Do you accept that, without the Acorn project, we cannot decarbonise Grangemouth on the scale that is required?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Colin Smyth
Good morning to the panel. One of NSET’s priorities is to capitalise on the opportunities of the transition to net zero. Would it be a fair assessment to say that, although the growth of renewables has significantly reduced carbon emissions, it has not delivered for Scotland the economic benefits that it might have delivered? We were promised 130,000 green jobs by 2020. The Fraser of Allander Institute put the actual figure at 27,000. Recently, the trade unions highlighted the fact that only around 3,100 jobs have been created in offshore wind. Why have we failed to deliver the real potential in jobs from the growth in renewables?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Colin Smyth
You talk about learning the lessons from onshore wind, but the trade unions recently highlighted analysis that showed that we are also failing to deliver when it comes to offshore wind. Their analysis highlighted that the latest Office for National Statistics low carbon and renewable energy estimates showed that
“In 2014, every £1 million in income made by offshore wind companies translated to 7 jobs for workers in Scotland”
and that
“this plummeted to 1 job per £1 million”
of turnover for offshore wind farm companies in 2021. Therefore, the big wind farm companies seem to be doing rather well out of it, but why is that not translating into jobs? Why do we appear to be going backwards?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Colin Smyth
This is a whole new subject, which means that you will need to completely change your papers, minister. The committee is keen to hear from the Government on the role of co-operatives in the wellbeing economy. What do you see as the role of co-operatives and how will the Government support their growth as a model?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Colin Smyth
One of the reasons why I asked the question is that it is fair to say that there was a lot of criticism of the lack of detail in the wider just transition plan for energy that was published recently, not least from your just transition commission, which was not consulted on that development. It said:
“we are … deeply concerned about the lack of evidence of adequate policy actions to deliver a just transition for the Energy sector, particularly given the urgent need to shift gear in the rest of the 2020s.”
Friends of the Earth pretty much said that it was more of the same when we know that more of the same will not deliver our net zero targets.
Do you recognise the criticism that the draft just transition plan lacked the detail that we need to deliver the just transition that we all want?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Colin Smyth
Those targets, and the route map to monitor them, will be contained in the plan for Grangemouth when you publish it. Is that right?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Colin Smyth
Good morning, cabinet secretary. The Grangemouth plan will be the first regional just transition plan. How will it differ from the sectoral plans that have been published, and how, specifically, will you measure success?
We know that any energy transition is likely to reduce emissions. However, there has been criticism in the past that, although the growth of onshore wind, for example, has contributed to a reduction in emissions, it has not delivered the economic boost for which there was real potential.
How do we make sure that, with the plan for Grangemouth, we do not repeat the mistakes of the past? How will you measure that? Will there be specific measurements in the plan to enable us to assess whether it is a genuine just transition plan?