The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 942 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
I turn to Neil McInroy. Do EDAS members have any take on the idea of a cluttered landscape, and the complexity of growth deals?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
Thank you very much, Willie. I call Murdo Fraser.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
I welcome to the panel Paul Mitchell, who is operations director at the Scottish Building Federation. I will give you a chance to catch your breath, Paul, so I bring in my colleague Daniel Johnson just now.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
Our next item of business is the first evidence session in our inquiry into city region and regional growth deals.
On Monday, some committee members visited the National Robotarium at Heriot-Watt University to learn more about how the Edinburgh and south-east Scotland city region deal has supported that facility. I thank Stewart Miller, the chief executive, and Emily Fletcher, the events co-ordinator, at the Robotarium for what was—I think that members will agree—an informative and enjoyable visit.
It is probably the first time that the committee has questioned a robot in evidence during an inquiry. To be fair, Ameca is the world’s most advanced humanoid robot, showcasing just how far robotics and artificial intelligence have come and the enormous potential that they offer, so it might be some of the best evidence that we have taken during the inquiry—there is no pressure on our panel this morning, then.
The National Robotarium is an example of a project whose build was made possible through a city growth deal. There was £21 million from the United Kingdom Government, and £1.4 million from the Scottish Government through the Edinburgh and south-east Scotland city region deal, which is one of 12 such deals across Scotland. The aim of our inquiry is to consider the implementation and effectiveness of those deals and how they contribute to local and national economies.
This session aims to provide members with an overview of the deals. I am pleased to welcome our panel: Cornilius Chikwama is audit director and Catherine Young is a senior manager, both from Audit Scotland; and Neil McInroy is chair of the Economic Development Association Scotland. They will be joined shortly by Paul Mitchell, who is operations director at the Scottish Building Federation. As always, members and witnesses should keep their questions and answers as concise as possible so that we can get through as many questions as possible.
I begin with a question on the funding landscape for city and regional growth deals; it may be mainly for Audit Scotland. It is fair to say that the funding landscape is complex. There are numerous different funding sources, all from organisations with their own priorities, timescales and governance arrangements. What are the implications, if any, of that cluttered landscape? Could the projects that are coming forward through the city and regional growth deals have been funded through the normal traditional funding mechanisms, such as Government grants to councils or direct Government funding to a particular project? Would that have been a simpler way to deliver those projects?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
You obviously intend to ensure that the uprating comes in at the beginning of April each year, and the regulations will come in at the beginning of April 2025. Does that mean that any further consultation will not result in changes being made until April 2026 at the very earliest?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
Paul Mitchell, do not worry. A whole list of construction questions is coming soon, so do not think you are getting off lightly at all. I know that Willie Coffey, who is joining us online, has a number of questions on governance.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
So, a consultation would be carried out in time to ensure that any future regulations come before the Parliament before the end of 2025 to ensure that any changes are implemented in 2026.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
I think that the point is that the committee prefers our round number of £1,000 to the one that the Government has chosen. It is important to say that, because of the changes in the banding, people who are on lower incomes will pay less per month, but, overall, they will pay the same because, ultimately, the debt will be pursued. To be clear, will the consultation specifically include consultation on raising the figure to £1,000?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
Okay, and will the consultation start early in the new year?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Colin Smyth
As there are no other questions, I am happy to ask the committee to note the Diligence against Earnings (Variation) (Scotland) Regulations 2024 at this stage, and I thank the minister and the panel for attending.
09:52 Meeting suspended.