The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1083 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Thank you, minister. You have already touched on an important point by asking whether we need the bill. No member of this committee is against community wealth building—many are passionate about it. However, is the bill ambitious enough? What will it deliver that could not be delivered via, for example, an agreement with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities or ministerial direction to other public bodies? Why do we need legislation when those vehicles could have delivered clear direction to public bodies?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Okay. We may come back to that issue.
As members have no further questions, that brings us to the end of the evidence session. I thank the minister and all the officials for joining us. I will suspend the meeting briefly to allow a change of witnesses.
10:06 Meeting suspended.Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Colin Smyth
I am sure that we will come back to that very important point tomorrow with the company.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Gordon MacDonald, do you want to come back in with a supplementary question?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Minister, I have a question that you may be able to answer with your wider public sector reform hat on. The bill aims to empower local authorities to transform local economies through community wealth building. However, councils in Scotland still lack a general power of competence, which is something that councils in England were given by section 1 of the Localism Act 2011, which effectively gave them the ability to do anything unless it is prohibited by law. That seems to have helped cities such as Preston to pursue some innovative work on community wealth building.
Is there a concern that, without that general power of competence, councils might be hesitant to pursue some innovative approaches for fear of overstepping their legal responsibilities?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Colin Smyth
On that point, what consideration was given to creating a formal role for those anchor organisations when it comes to co-designing the action plan itself? You have highlighted the importance of those organisations, but should they not be co-designing the action plan with local authorities?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Colin Smyth
I will bring in Daniel Johnson. No pressure, Daniel, but we are looking for some plain speaking.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
That would be helpful.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Kevin Stewart wishes to come in with a supplementary question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
One of the points that has been put to us is that the duty—I appreciate the point you make about the duty and the fact that there are mixed opinions on that—is not as much about trying to get local government to engage in the approach as it is about trying to get other bodies around the table. The bill will specify a list of organisations that need to be at the table. I appreciate that you have to be diplomatic, but has that been an issue for COSLA in the past, and do you welcome that?