The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 942 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
Has the role of Scottish Enterprise in growth deals changed? Matt Lockley, you seemed to suggest that Scottish Enterprise did not necessarily support particular economic growth priorities of local authorities, as you have a separate remit from them. Has your involvement in growth deals changed that at all? Are you more involved in projects that the agency would not necessarily have been involved in previously?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
Did they not exist through the economic partnerships?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
To follow up Kevin Stewart’s line of questioning, I will take us back the issue of the cluttered landscape. We are beginning to hear from our evidence that there is a desire to go beyond growth deals 1 and look at growth deals 2 and the future of the structures that have been developed as part of growth deals. Do you have a view on that?
I have heard a couple of people touch on how engagement is also through regional economic partnerships. Do we need to continue the growth deal structures or should that work sit with regional economic partnerships? I do not know whether you have a view on that, and maybe it is unfair to ask you but, given that in some cases you are involved in the growth deals and that in all cases you sit on regional economic partnerships, do you think that we need both? I see everybody putting their heads down and running for cover. Does anybody want to answer that question?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
I have another question. Did we need growth deals? Could the projects have been delivered using the structures that you are all involved in daily? Local authorities have economic development teams. Could we have delivered the projects without the need for growth deals and maybe done so quicker? I did not have any grey hairs when we first started discussing the Borderlands growth deal, but they are starting to develop quite quickly and we still do not have a lot of projects off the ground. I appreciate these things take time, but did we need growth deals? Could we have delivered what is being delivered without them?
That is another easy question. You can all put your head down again. [Laughter.]
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
It is slightly more complex for you, Anthony Daye, because the area includes Cumbria—or Cumberland as it now called—and Northumbria. I do not know whether SOSE has a view.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
That is great. Thank you very much for that.
Looking around, I see that there are no other questions, so that brings us to the end of the morning’s evidence session. I thank our witnesses for joining us today and for contributing their comments, which I know will play a key role in our final report.
11:53 Meeting continued in private until 12:32.Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
Thank you for that. I turn to Scottish Enterprise, which is involved in eight of the 12 city and region and growth deals. Is that purely because the geography of the other four sits with HIE and SOSE? Is that why you are involved in eight of the 12 deals?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
On your actual involvement, are you a voting member on the eight boards that oversee the growth deals?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
Thank you. We might come back to you on that point, because I know that the committee is keen to do some work around the implementation of the review and the changes on the skills front.
Now, back to the A75—[Laughter.] I am only joking.
That brings us to the end of our first evidence session. I thank the secretary of state and Alasdair MacDonald for joining us today. It was a thorough session that will certainly make a big contribution to this committee’s work on the growth deal.
I will suspend the meeting to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
10:30 Meeting suspended.Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Smyth
We now move to the second evidence session this morning. I am pleased to welcome Anthony Daye, interim director of place and enterprise at South of Scotland Enterprise; Zoe Laird, head of growth deals and digital at Highlands and Islands Enterprise; and Derek Shaw, director of scaling innovation, and Matt Lockley, head of partnerships, at Scottish Enterprise.
As always, I appeal to members and witnesses to keep questions and answers as concise as possible. I will probably break that rule with the first question, which may not be too concise. I am keen to get a take on your involvement with growth deals, because it varies by growth deal and in different parts of Scotland. We will start with Highlands and Islands Enterprise because you have a full house and are involved in all four deals in your area. Is that as a voting member of the board? Can you explain the differences?