The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1122 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I have a tiny question. I apologise if I missed this in the detail, but when was the list last updated?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Rona Mackay
My initial reaction is that I am delighted that the change is happening. Deafblind Scotland is based in my constituency, and it is a fantastic organisation. It is good that the dual sensory impairment is being recognised, so I am absolutely for the change. I am not opposed to the idea of the CPG merging with the one on visual impairment, but I am absolutely happy about changing the purpose of the CPG on deafness.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I propose that we be clear that we are not doubting or trying to claw back from the proposed change but are very supportive of it. Sue Webber makes a good point—I agree with it—but I am worried that it might be perceived as us saying, “Oh, we’re not sure that that should happen,” when it should happen.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I will move on to ask about the rehabilitation programme. Pam Gosal, do you think that there is currently adequate provision of domestic abuse programmes—either in prison or in the community—to meet the demand that could arise if your bill were to be passed? I ask that question because it says in one of our papers:
“the requirement for assessment applies to anyone convicted of a domestic abuse offence, regardless of whether this took place before the enforcement of this section of the Bill.”
That would open it up to an awful lot of people. Are you confident that there is adequate provision for the extra people that that would bring into a rehabilitation pathway?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I just wanted to go back to the quashing question. Why did you go down the route of quashing and not pardoning. Is there any particular reason?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
To pick up on the convener’s line of questioning, international opinion or evidence conflicts with what you said about the success of the Nordic model.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
It was on, I think. I was probably just leaning away from it.
You will also be aware that a substantial body of sex workers do not agree with your proposals. In fact, recently, there was a delegation outside the Parliament protesting about it. Obviously, there is a difference of views.
In addition, the internet is now used much more widely for the purchase of sex. Some sex workers say that your bill will make them less safe. At the moment, they can screen buyers on the internet. They differentiate between bad clients and good clients. They fear that, if your bill becomes law, they will be left with bad clients who are more likely to abuse them, because those clients do not care about the law and will break the law anyway. There is some fear among sex workers that the bill will make them less safe. I put their case to you for comment. It is not my opinion.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I am sorry to interrupt. Do you know that ASSIST—the advocacy, support, safety, information and services together project—and other organisations go into schools?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Are you expecting teachers to provide the education that you are talking about? Have you engaged with any of the teaching agencies?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I will raise one final wee thing: one sex worker said that she fears that the proposals will make her less safe, and she does not want her body to be seen as a crime scene. You can develop that way of thinking if you are involved in that trade.