The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1131 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
That is fine. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
Thank you. That is really useful.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
Wendy Sinclair-Gieben, I have some questions for you. The number of women on remand is shockingly high—I do not need to tell you that—and the disruption to families that follows is evident. Why do you think that so many women are remanded for low-level offences? Why are they there in the first place? I do not know whether you heard the previous session, but we spoke to a solicitor who had dealt with a case where the person was directed to the 218 project in Glasgow, which is hugely successful. I put it to her that, if that happened more often, fewer women would be remanded. What is your view?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
David Mackie, what is your view on the removal of section 23D? Are women’s organisations and victims right to be concerned about that? I presume that you heard the earlier session, where it was unanimously agreed that it should be removed. I still cannot get my head around that, but maybe you can give me your view.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
Good morning. I have three questions—one for each of you. Professor Loucks, you mentioned your organisation’s excellent and very detailed report on the cost to families of imprisonment and release. We do not have time to delve into the report, obviously, but what is its key message?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
I understand what you are saying, but, if I take that back to perception and to a very simplistic level, that is not how victims of domestic abuse or women’s organisations will see it, because it still gives the impression that it will be easier for alleged perpetrators to get out on bail.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
So, individual risk would be taken into consideration just as much as public risk.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
I am conscious of the time, but I have one other question and, rather than ask everybody to respond, I will ask Joanne McMillan to do so.
It is currently estimated that, at any one time, 30 per cent of the female prison population in Scotland is on remand. To me, that is a huge number. Some 54 per cent of them lose their tenancies, 61 per cent have children, and there are huge knock-on effects for families.
Joanne McMillan talked about a case in which the woman went to the 218 project, which is very successful. In your opinion, why does that not happen more often? Is it because of a lack of resources?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
From a non-legal point of view, I ask: why remove them anyway? What is the point? It does not send out a good message to non-legal people. From what I have heard this morning, if someone asked me why those provisions were taken out, I am not entirely sure that I could convince them why that was done.
The KC who was here referred to a case in Livingston and the introduction of section 23D in 2005. It was a horrific case—you might remember it. The person who was released went on to kill an 11-year-old boy and then hanged himself. He had been given bail, and the case was so shocking that the then First Minister decided that we needed to do something about it. I am unclear why those provisions are being removed.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Rona Mackay
I understand that.