The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 936 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rona Mackay
So, when you heard jurors deliberating in the mock trials, did you hear them say, for example, “I don’t think there is enough evidence for that, so we might as well say that it is not proven.”?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rona Mackay
It is quite surprising to hear that juries will have to make that decision even though they do not fully understand the difference between the two verdicts. Should more training be given to juries? Is the manual adequate in that respect?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rona Mackay
My question was going to be exactly the same as Russell Findlay’s question—I was going to push you both to say what your preferred balance would be.
However, to go back to sexual offence cases, I just want to get on record that the not proven verdict is used disproportionately in rape cases. Not proven made up 44 per cent of rape and attempted rape acquittals in comparison with 20 per cent of all crimes and offences. That is a huge imbalance.
Your research has led you to believe that we should abolish the not proven verdict, and you have answered the question that I have just outlined by saying that you cannot really say what your preferred balance would be.
My next question is another tricky one. In your estimation, if the verdict were to be abolished, what would be acceptable to the legal profession? What do you think that it would suggest as an optimum?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rona Mackay
I just wondered whether there was an easy path that you thought might be acceptable. However, I appreciate what you are saying and that we would need to ask the legal profession.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rona Mackay
I know—I just thought that, with your background, maybe you would have a view.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rona Mackay
I accept that—I understand. That is fine.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Rona Mackay
Good morning. Does the judge explain what not proven is at any point in a real courtroom, either in his summing up or in direction? That is my first question. I genuinely do not know what is actually said.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Rona Mackay
To put into context some of the things that we have been hearing, I note that a pilot project was started in September for the new process. That will be evaluated to assess resource requirements, whether the process is workable and so on. That started in September, as I said, and it is on-going. We need to wait to see what the outcome of that is. There is also the short-life strategic leadership group, which reports to ministers through a cross-portfolio ministerial group for prisoner health and social care.
There are things happening as a result of our meeting with Gill Imery. It is easy to cherry pick things that may still need to be implemented, but I think that the wheels are definitely turning now, and I hope that things come to a good conclusion.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Rona Mackay
The cabinet secretary talks in her letter about the round table and the working group, which meets again this month. She will feed back on the outcome of the discussion, including the finalised terms of reference for the group. We expect that to be imminent.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Rona Mackay
Following on from your comments about changing practice and culture when it comes to trauma-informed practice, I want to ask you about floating trials in solemn cases. We have heard from witnesses and some women’s organisations that floating trials prolong the trauma and anxiety of rape complainers. The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service has defended their use, and there is nothing in the bill to address the issue.
What are your thoughts on floating trial diets? Can you understand the anxiety that it is claimed they cause victims?