The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 936 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Rona Mackay
I assume that that is not a road that you would want to go down if we could get the balance right with what you consider to be a fair jury size.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Rona Mackay
So, in the new court, it would not be mandatory and people could choose not to submit pre-recorded evidence.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Rona Mackay
Do you have concerns about any perception that a sexual offences court would be downgraded, because it would be less—shall we say—sombre and serious than a High Court, which, traditionally, has dealt with rape and murder cases?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Rona Mackay
Good morning, Lord Advocate. To follow on from John Swinney’s line of questioning, I note that, in your previous evidence to the committee, you said that only 20 per cent of single-complainer rape cases resulted in convictions. Setting aside corroboration, as it is not in the bill, do you think that the removal of the not proven verdict would improve that situation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Rona Mackay
That is fine. I just wanted to clarify that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Rona Mackay
That is great.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Rona Mackay
Good morning. Professor Thomas, your research casts doubt on the existence, or the prevalence, of rape myths. However, your results show that 43 per cent agreed with the statement:
“I would expect anyone that was raped to be very emotional when giving evidence in court”.
We heard some very powerful evidence from survivors, one of whom said that she felt that she was penalised because she was not crying; it was not how she was dealing with her trauma on that particular day. She was also told that she could not sit in the public gallery, because it would be a bad look. We have heard a lot of evidence like that.
Another part of your research says that 23 per cent agreed or were not sure that,
“If a woman sends sexually explicit texts or messages to a man she should not accuse him of rape later on”.
I find that very concerning. The numbers that I have quoted—43 per cent and 23 per cent—are not small. Do you find that concerning?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Rona Mackay
I have a brief supplementary question on what you have just said. I understand that you have been involved in civil cases involving personal injury actions for rape et cetera, in which the decision was made by a judge sitting alone. Does that change the way that the case is presented?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Rona Mackay
That is interesting. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Rona Mackay
Going back to the 43 per cent, do you agree that that is a rape myth? You just said that judges have—