The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1131 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Rona Mackay
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Rona Mackay
Good afternoon. I have a brief question about the mental health of police officers who deal with vulnerable people. The previous witnesses were very positive about that and said that enough has been done to give police officers support in that respect. We know that the issue affects a lot of police officers, and the SPF says that many people leave the profession because of the mental stress that they are under. Are you happy that enough has been done in that respect? Are you happy with the measures that have been taken to support officers?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Rona Mackay
If staff require counselling after a specific incident, do they know that that is there for them?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Rona Mackay
Historically, Police Scotland—or the legacy forces—did not have a good track record in that area, but I am really encouraged to hear both what the previous panel of witnesses said was going on and what you have reaffirmed today.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Rona Mackay
Chief Superintendent Matt Paden, for context, how many safe spaces are operating throughout Scotland at the moment?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Rona Mackay
Again, with respect, we know that sexual offences are, by their nature, unique. Witnesses have told us of their terrible experiences because there is no uniformity in the way that they are treated. A sexual offences court would surely address that. Again, that is what they want.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Rona Mackay
Has that not got to do with corroboration, which still exists despite the—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Rona Mackay
The Government has tried to balance the removal of the not proven verdict by moving to the two-thirds majority, as opposed to a simple majority, but in your opinion, that is not acceptable—is that correct?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Rona Mackay
There is a bit of hypothesising going on there, but okay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Rona Mackay
I fundamentally disagree with the opinion that a sexual offences court is not necessary. With the greatest of respect, we have been hearing for years about the journey of victims of sexual offences, and nothing has happened and nothing is happening. I have been on committees dealing with this for eight years, we talked about it eight years ago and the position for victims has not got better.
We are talking about a trauma-informed, specialist court that, as you probably heard our earlier witnesses say, is very much wanted by victims. I do not think that it should come down to logistics or money. If we can make it work, we should make it work. That is my view. It is necessary and long overdue.
My question picks up on something that Sandy Brindley said about her misgivings about a judge being able to decide whether a victim should have special measures and whether that should be up to the victim to decide. What are the witnesses’ opinions on that?