The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1131 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I just wanted to go back to the quashing question. Why did you go down the route of quashing and not pardoning. Is there any particular reason?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
To pick up on the convener’s line of questioning, international opinion or evidence conflicts with what you said about the success of the Nordic model.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
It was on, I think. I was probably just leaning away from it.
You will also be aware that a substantial body of sex workers do not agree with your proposals. In fact, recently, there was a delegation outside the Parliament protesting about it. Obviously, there is a difference of views.
In addition, the internet is now used much more widely for the purchase of sex. Some sex workers say that your bill will make them less safe. At the moment, they can screen buyers on the internet. They differentiate between bad clients and good clients. They fear that, if your bill becomes law, they will be left with bad clients who are more likely to abuse them, because those clients do not care about the law and will break the law anyway. There is some fear among sex workers that the bill will make them less safe. I put their case to you for comment. It is not my opinion.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I am sorry to interrupt. Do you know that ASSIST—the advocacy, support, safety, information and services together project—and other organisations go into schools?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Are you expecting teachers to provide the education that you are talking about? Have you engaged with any of the teaching agencies?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
I will raise one final wee thing: one sex worker said that she fears that the proposals will make her less safe, and she does not want her body to be seen as a crime scene. You can develop that way of thinking if you are involved in that trade.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
There is a huge difference between quashing and pardoning.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Are you not able to define that for the Prevention of Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Bill?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Yes—it is just a small question on what Agata Maslowska said about the most serious sex offenders.
What criteria are you using for that? What constitutes a serious offender? Is it somebody who has been convicted and sentenced to a certain length of time?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Rona Mackay
Okay. I want to move on to training in schools. I think that what you are suggesting is very vague. I am all for early education on the subject in schools, but we need to know who would design the schemes. Would teachers do that, or would you bring in specialists? Also, if such training were to be done properly, it seems to me that the cost would be substantial. Can you say more about who would design it and who would carry it out?