The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 926 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Rona Mackay
Oh, right—we are on to media. Okay. First, on the point about committee cohesion, I will just give a shout out for the Criminal Justice Committee. We are currently putting through two huge pieces of legislation—the Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill and the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill—and I would say that we are acting as a team. Those bills are hugely important and we want to make good legislation. We are putting party politics aside and are all working together. I wish that more committees did that. I just wanted to make that point, and I agree with you about committee cohesion, too.
As you are a former journalist, Brian, I am dying to ask you questions. We know how things have changed in the media. How has social media changed the landscape with regard to how and what you report?
10:00Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rona Mackay
I would just like to go back to the decisions to release prisoners and, specifically, amendment 251.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rona Mackay
I completely agree with what Sharon says—you laid out the situation well. We know what the situation is, however, so I am not sure that the amendment is necessary. You have stated the effects of not having floating trial diets as well as the harm that they do, and the courts are aware of that, so I do not think that the amendment is necessary.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rona Mackay
You have not spoken to it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rona Mackay
I thought that I had missed it. There is an important point that I want to make about it. I apologise.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rona Mackay
Will the member give way?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rona Mackay
I understand that, but I think that your amendment runs the risk of having a bearing on a decision. Because it is there, it might sway a decision when it comes to someone who cannot articulate this sort of thing for themselves. That is my concern.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Rona Mackay
I have huge sympathy for and agree with the intention behind the amendments, particularly with regard to witnesses’ safety and that of their families. However, my concern on the remorse element is whether you have taken into consideration people with communication difficulties or those who might be neurodivergent and struggle to show remorse. Their behaviour in prison might have been exemplary, but they just cannot get that remorse over to the Parole Board. The converse is true for some prisoners who can articulate remorse but who maybe have not shown a great deal of progress in prison. A high number of prisoners will be in that category, so it is important that that is taken into consideration.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Rona Mackay
I totally agree with the sentiment behind the amendment, but I think that you used the phrase “where practically possible” in your speech. Have you done any research into how practical this would be, given the pressure on courts and court staff?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Rona Mackay
Convener, is it okay if I go on to part 5?