The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 909 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Kate Forbes
Thank you. I just wanted to get that on the record.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Kate Forbes
One of the respondents to the consultation said:
“a change in the levy ceiling within the Order must not be taken by QMS as industry agreement to an increase in the levy rates paid”.
I assume that you agree with that, but I do not want to put words in your mouth, because it is for QMS to determine that.
Secondly, we understand that, although there is no requirement for QMS to consult, ministerial approval is still required at the start of each financial year, regardless of whether there is a change to the payable rates.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Kate Forbes
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Kate Forbes
That would be useful.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Kate Forbes
I want to unpack a little why your proposed legislation is needed compared with what we have already. I think that you have answered that question quite comprehensively, but why do you think that the Scottish Government has not updated or revisited the existing code, although it is different from what you propose, since 2010? Is that indicative of a lack of concern by the Scottish Government, or is it indicative that it feels that updating the code would not necessarily solve the problem anyway? I know that that is a question for the minister—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Kate Forbes
It sounds to me as though all the questions about what happens to the levy after this technical instrument is passed should really be directed to QMS.
Cabinet secretary, I took heart from what you have said this morning and from what you said in a previous letter, which was that you would expect QMS to fully consult as widely as possible and to engage with producers and processors before taking any action on the proposed increase. Many of the questions stem from a concern that right now it is hugely challenging for producers, in particular, to make any sort of margin in the industry. Will you say a bit more, broadly, on what role you expect QMS to take and how the Government is supporting producers and farmers more widely at a difficult time?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Kate Forbes
Our core question is whether the laudable aims of the bill are best served through alternative legislation or changes to the current legislation. I think that you have answered that helpfully.
I will make a final small point. You have made the point that what is distinct about the bill is that you are reaching prospective keepers and owners rather than existing ones. That is a notoriously difficult group to reach because, by their nature, they are not necessarily easy to identify. Being able to do that boils down to somebody having the foresight that they might have to engage with the process. How do you envisage raising awareness so that prospective keepers know that they will now be caught by new legislation?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Kate Forbes
—but you must have considered whether that might have been a route for achieving the purposes that you want to achieve.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Kate Forbes
Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Kate Forbes
To go back to Mark Ruskell’s question on retrospectively considering areas where we have not aligned, I want to look at how the Government defines “where appropriate” in relation to alignment in the statement of policy. The statement says that Scotland will seek to align with the EU
“where appropriate and in a manner that contributes towards maintaining and advancing standards”,
protecting health and wellbeing and maintaining our international standards, none of which anyone would disagree with. Will the minister unpack a bit of how the Government interprets that appropriateness, and who is final arbiter of that?
I imagine that there are two principal reasons why it may not be appropriate to align: first, where we are bound by UK law and it would be therefore unlawful for us to deviate from UK standards; and secondly, where it might significantly disadvantage our citizens for whatever reason because we are trying to compete in an EU market and in a UK market and so on.
Could you outline that, although I fully understand that, if we were a part of the EU, those questions would not emerge, because we would not have to define appropriateness?