The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1745 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Clare Haughey
I appreciate that we have already gone over time, but I believe that Sandesh Gulhane has a question. If we could have a brief question and a short answer, that would be wonderful.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Clare Haughey
Thank you, minister. One member of the committee wishes to speak.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Clare Haughey
The question is, that motion S6M-12220 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Clare Haughey
There will be a division.
For
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Mackay, Gillian (Central Scotland) (Green)
Maguire, Ruth (Cunnninghame South) (SNP)
McKee, Ivan (Glasgow Provan) (SNP)
Mochan, Carol (South Scotland) (Lab)
Torrance, David (Kirkcaldy) (SNP)
Sweeney, Paul (Glasgow) (Lab)
Against
Gulhane, Dr. Sandesh (Glasgow) (Con)
White, Tess (North East Region) (Con)
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Clare Haughey
Minister, would you like to sum up and respond to the debate?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Clare Haughey
There will be a division.
For
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Mackay, Gillian (Central Scotland) (Green)
Maguire, Ruth (Cunnninghame South) (SNP)
McKee, Ivan (Glasgow Provan) (SNP)
Mochan, Carol (South Scotland) (Lab)
Torrance, David (Kirkcaldy) (SNP)
Sweeney, Paul (Glasgow) (Lab)
Against
Gulhane, Dr. Sandesh (Glasgow) (Con)
White, Tess (North East Region) (Con)
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Clare Haughey
The result of the division is: For 8, Against 2, Abstentions 0.
Motion agreed to.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Clare Haughey
At our next meeting, on 16 April, we will consider a negative instrument and a draft stage 1 report on the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill.
10:59 Meeting continued in private until 11:57.Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
I want to probe something that you have said a wee bit more. You were talking about balancing the need to move quickly enough versus the parliamentary process. Fast law is not necessarily good law. Will you expand on what you meant, given the level of concern that people have expressed in oral and written evidence about how they feel buffer zones would impact on their rights to protest and express a view? Will you give us a bit more of an idea about where not moving quickly enough might cause issues?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
We will move on. I questioned the minister earlier about protected premises. As you were in the room, I will not give you the preamble about the evidence that we have taken, which I am sure that you are aware of. I am interested in knowing whether the definition of protected premises in the bill is sufficient to allow the inclusion of other premises, such as GP surgeries and pharmacies, should that be required.