The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1604 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
We are not talking about making buffer zones smaller. As a response to what was a criminal act, a buffer zone would be extended on a ministerial decision, rather than through Parliament making such a decision.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
I call Ruth Maguire.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
Given the caveat that there would be further consultation, how would the Scottish Government ensure that human rights were respected within any change, given that that would extend the buffer zones into many more premises and cover a much wider area across the country, particularly in urban areas?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
Minister, you will be aware that the committee has taken evidence on the definition of protected premises. In both oral and written evidence, we have had very different views. Some stakeholder organisations were keen that the definition be expanded, while others were very much against that and were troubled by it. Could you outline the steps, planning and consultation that the Scottish Government will undertake to inform any decisions about extending the definition of protected premises?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
David Torrance has a question.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
Emma Harper has a supplementary question.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
I am keen to hear your views on whether the meaning of protected premises should be broadened. You spoke a bit about that in response to Sandesh Gulhane’s question about coverage, particularly in urban areas, where large parts of towns and cities might be covered by a buffer zone. Have you given some thought to what impact capturing more protected premises under the bill might have on the rights of anti-abortion protesters or vigil holders?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
There is no law saying that, if someone happens to be standing there, I could complain to the police that they are silently praying and trying to intimidate me or change my intent to access the service.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
Is that correct under current legislation or did I pick that up wrongly?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
Clare Haughey
I will go to Ruth Maguire next, then to David Torrance and Ross Greer, but I have a question to ask first.
I want to get this clear in my head, and from the questions that members have asked, it does not sound as though everyone else is clear about it. If, after the bill is made law, a woman who is accessing the services sees one, two or even three people standing in the 200m exclusion zone and she is concerned that they might be praying silently, will she be able to make a complaint to the police or the authorities that she feels intimidated by those individuals without knowing why they happen to be standing in that exclusion zone?